Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:31 AM
sh58 sh58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: brighton
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

[ QUOTE ]
Also, seen as nobody has said it yet, you shouldn't be calling in whatever position you called in with Q9s.

[/ QUOTE ]

minraise from nit, you have position with a decent hand and are 250BB deep, you have to start calling with marginal hands in these spots
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:34 AM
sh58 sh58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: brighton
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

[ QUOTE ]
It's a suited 2 gapper against a nit open. Where do you draw the line? Any suited cards? Any semi connected cards? Any 2 cards?

[/ QUOTE ]

alot of crappy hands. you are getting sick implied odds against a nit when you are deep
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:35 AM
Daddy Warbucks Daddy Warbucks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Doin\' numbers like Soduku
Posts: 3,968
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

You have sick implied odds against a nit? Okay.....
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:36 AM
Shizzle12345 Shizzle12345 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mordegai, the jiddish clown
Posts: 3,557
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

its funny tho, if i got a nitty image, i can expect to shove this and only get called by AQ. Sick fold equity.

@daddy: I know of alot of nits who will go crazy with alot of hands they shouldnt go crazy with, with theyr image. They have a pretty good hand more oft.en then a tag or lag.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:37 AM
myke11 myke11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 406
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

He always has it! that said.. i stack off, and then quit my session and break [censored]
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:59 AM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

he's not doing this with a set. this guy is only doing this with the nuts.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-05-2007, 12:08 PM
Burcak Burcak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 154
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

I think most guys do this with the nuts only without history.

I also don't think it is even close to fold, and that this is either the nuts or a misclick.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-05-2007, 12:12 PM
BobbyLight BobbyLight is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 96
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

How can this be a misclick? The pot was around $28.

He misclicked two extra numbers and then hit bet?

Can somebody explain the misclick process to me.

Do work,

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-05-2007, 12:21 PM
Burcak Burcak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 154
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

Once I was playing at a table and wanted to make a cont. bet, then I turned my attention to other tables, when I looked back my opponent had requested time, I was surprised but I turned my attention to other tables again, then when I looked back I was all in, I don't know how this works tho.

I guess the mouse wheel mostly, or he wanted to bet like x.yz and bet xyz etc.

I still dont know why I moved all in there. It's pretty rare though. But I sometimes open for 8bb hehe.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-05-2007, 12:22 PM
DaycareInferno DaycareInferno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: wot u say
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: I thought we were being friendly

yeah, its not hard to do, especially if you use some sort of script/macro. not that i think there's much chance of it at any given point in time, but wotever.

FullTiltPoker Game #4064475158: Table Charles (6 max) - $0.50/$1 - No Limit Hold'em - 7:58:16 ET - 2007/11/04
Seat 1: HellGeat ($95.50)
Seat 2: calicoocoo ($251.75)
Seat 3: The Orange Frog ($100)
Seat 4: hurricanecv ($144.50)
Seat 5: stackproof ($280.80)
Seat 6: Gakmar ($100)
calicoocoo posts the small blind of $0.50
The Orange Frog posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Gakmar [9s Jh]
hurricanecv calls $1
stackproof folds
Gakmar raises to $5
HellGeat folds
calicoocoo folds
The Orange Frog folds
hurricanecv calls $4
*** FLOP *** [5h 7s Kd]
hurricanecv bets $6
Gakmar raises to $95, and is all in
calicoocoo stands up
hurricanecv has 15 seconds left to act
hurricanecv folds
Uncalled bet of $89 returned to Gakmar
Gakmar mucks
Gakmar wins the pot ($22.35)
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $23.50 | Rake $1.15
Board: [5h 7s Kd]
Seat 1: HellGeat (button) didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: calicoocoo (small blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 3: The Orange Frog (big blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 4: hurricanecv folded on the Flop
Seat 5: stackproof didn't bet (folded)
Seat 6: Gakmar collected ($22.35), mucked
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.