#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
[ QUOTE ]
Dear Absolute Support, Go to hell. [/ QUOTE ] |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
Has Absolute's traffic taken a hit since this incident?
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
[ QUOTE ]
With respect to the allegation of chip dumping, we have determined that chip dumping by at least one of the accounts at issue, did in fact, take place. We have determined that the chip dumping was made to several seemingly unrelated accounts. We are continuing to investigate this issue. [/ QUOTE ] [b]<font color="purple"> I spent over 2 hours on the phone with Adrian, who claims to be the head of Absolute security. He told me categorically that he had reviewed the chip-dumping HHs that I had sent him, and that although they did indeed *look* like chip-dumping, the security team had determined 100% that it was NOT. I remind you, Adrian claims to be the head of Absolute security. So was he lying to me, or just mistaken? We have the hand-histories of player DOUBLEDRAG dumping to player ROMNALDO. DOUBLEDRAG is the account that has more or less been proven to have superuser capability. Are you telling us that it is just one giant coincidence that the player alleged to have stolen funds then went on a $250,000 chip-dumping spree? Why did Adrian claim that all accounts had been 100% cleared of wrong-doing if this was not true? ***Sorry for the purple font; I feel like my post is entitled to a little more significance, given that I was one of the ones to have had $6,000 stolen from him by DoubleDrag -- I then walked the head of Absolute security by the hand to the chip-dumping hand-histories to which he replied that they were NOT chip-dumping (only to have you now state the opposite, whoever you are). I have a recording of that phone conversation. If you return my $6,000 and the over $50,000 stolen from IkesToys, then I will consider playing at your site again. Alternatively, you can have an English-speaking member of upper management, if one exists, call me to explain the situation -- you know who I am***</font> |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
[ QUOTE ]
Absolute Poker was created by poker players who value security and fair play. [/ QUOTE ] A big lie is discovered through small ones, like this statement. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
Like AP would admit to a 'superuser' account if there was one. Why even make a thread? Everyone knew what this was going to say.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
I have reason to believe this is AP posting this and on the right track to doing the right thing. I hope they can address a few more concerns.
1. The VPIP/BB/100 chart 2. The drastic change of play by players that should have already had their accounts locked 3. The amount chip dumped to odd players 4. Whether these accounts were unlocked or whether AP still has these funds. I'm sure there are more q's I will have but those are good places to start. As much crap as I have given AP this post (if made by them which I believe to be the case) is a step in the right direction. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
[ QUOTE ]
is a step in the right direction. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno which is funnier, APs response or your above statement. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] is a step in the right direction. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno which is funnier, APs response or your above statement. [/ QUOTE ] Considering all they have done for the last year + is spam us starting a discussion about this is a huge step in the right direction. They have obviously left out a bunch of what we want to discuss but it is a start, better then hiding like they have been doing. I'm certainly not one to defend these people but this is far from the typical scumbag behavior they have done in this forum. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker\'s Official Response to \"superuser\" allegations
Dear Absolute Poker,
Once the chips are dumped, their is no doubt the accounts are related. Well done taking over a month and not figuring that out. Unless you mean the session where he seemingly dumped and flaunted it to 2+2ers after the threads were made known with brilliant plays such as calling with the second nut low on the river, losing a fraction of the money he won back. Regardless of which way you meant it, you truly are geniuses. Sincerely, apefish |
|
|