Negreanu Theorem with TPTK

[cbloom]

People saying call please esplain.

[pickless]

[ QUOTE ]
People saying call please esplain.

[/ QUOTE ]

[LMAO]

I have no comment on the hand, but as to raising AT utg... it depends [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

just want to add that i occassionally raise SCs utg... is that bad? thx.

[KeanuReaver]

im pretty loose, but i still fold ATo UTG most of the time. i think it depends a ton on the table dynamics though, which should be the second most important thing to consider when raising.

[fees]

call, this actually looks like a bluff to me

[Imrahil]

[ QUOTE ]
i think AT utg is marginally okay if you are sick postflop

marginally bad if you are really good postflop

and pretty bad if you aren't really good postflop

and i think that you probably aren't good enough pf to make that happen

its no offense, i dont think I am either

[/ QUOTE ]

We play 100NL and 200NL, not your 2000+NL. Most of the players we play against are really bad and are not going to give us a very difficult time playing ATo OOP. But I agree that at higher levels in tougher games I'd definitely fold this.

[mikechops]

So BW - I'm with you on ATo but I raise ATs. Does this get your blessing?

[doppelganger]

[ QUOTE ]
call, this actually looks like a bluff to me

[/ QUOTE ]

With a total AF of 0.5 this would be his once a week bluff quota. I think it's a pretty easy fold personally.

[RiverHebrew2]

lmao at the idea of the negraneu theorum. looks like something like 56, especially 56hh, which is y they c/c turn. As played, I have tough folding, but looks like u probably should becuz 67 also hit, so like the ONLY thing he could have is Tx and is doing this as a blocker/value? Yea slim chance; IMO he has 5x or 67 here like... 90% of the time.

[fees]

missed .5 uhh fold