Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-12-2007, 09:26 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
44 isn't folding to a turn bet



[/ QUOTE ]

If you say so. I would typically just bet this flop but I just feel like if villain goes into the hand thinking "set value" it doesn't really matter when you bet.

edit: and if you really think 44 isn't folding to a turn bet why don't we just autocheck ever flop with an overpair, bet turn, shove river and get snapcalled by fifth pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think 47/6 call PF with any plans like playing for set value. Its more like "I has a pair, lets see what happens, oh he's bluffing since he didn't bet the flop!".

About your second point, when did I say anything about 44 not folding to a river bet? The point is that it is easier for him to call turn with a bluff catcher and force us to fire a 2nd barrel, where we won't know whether he has 44/Qx/Jx or better.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-17-2007, 11:00 PM
scatt_man scatt_man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 332
Default Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking

fire the flop , then let go
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.