#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
[ QUOTE ]
...and there's 2 sets he can have higher than Hero's and 1.14 that's lower (.14 = 33 since he would have had to peel flop and turn it), so valuebetting vs sets isn't gonna be profitable. [/ QUOTE ] And 14% is an approximation? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
It's a number that made my post look intelligent. I practice metagame on 2+2 daily.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, so villain had TT or 55, you checked, are now results oriented and regret that you didn't turn your set into a bluff b/c he miiiight fold a better set? Yet you say villain has very little reason to put you on a straight. Am I right? [/ QUOTE ] well, yea obv. I guess its just a "what if" spot that I keep coming back to. obviously villain was aware enough of my range to check the river when the scare card hit but its hard to say whether he'd be thinking past " [censored] it I still have a set, I call" or "wow, how can he possibly be bluffing in this spot b/c everything that has showdown value in this spot should def. check" |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] ehh.. figured at the time his range was weighed heavier towards Tx that will most probably give up to a 3barrel on that board. [/ QUOTE ] what? that's like the least scariest board ever for Tx. [/ QUOTE ] So, you c/c 3 barrels when all you beat is air with Tx routinely? [/ QUOTE ] lol. When did I ever say that? All I said was this was the least scariest board for Tx. Have fun 3 barreling relative unknowns off top pair. |
|
|