#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
nh, now check (i think a check if he had a ten would be sexy)
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
c-bet please.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
I c-bet and check behind for obvious reasons.
Also bet/3-betting this flop is huge spew imo. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
[ QUOTE ]
c-bet please. [/ QUOTE ] C-betting is terrible here, man. Here's a stove of random [censored] that doesn't even include club draws: Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 76,230 games 0.003 secs 25,410,000 games/sec Board: 7h 9c 8c Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 34.385% 31.61% 02.77% 24100 2111.50 { 6c6d } Hand 1: 65.615% 62.85% 02.77% 47907 2111.50 { 55+, A9s, J9s+, T8s+, 97s+, 86s+, 75s+, 65s } In fact, you barely even beat a COMPLETELY RANDOM hand: Board: 7h 9c 8c Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 59.073% 56.60% 02.47% 605734 26461.50 { 6c6d } Hand 1: 40.927% 38.45% 02.47% 411533 26461.50 { random } C-betting here is just lighting money on fire. This hits a cold-calling range really hard. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] c-bet please. [/ QUOTE ] C-betting is terrible here, man. Here's a stove of random [censored] that doesn't even include club draws: Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 76,230 games 0.003 secs 25,410,000 games/sec Board: 7h 9c 8c Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 34.385% 31.61% 02.77% 24100 2111.50 { 6c6d } Hand 1: 65.615% 62.85% 02.77% 47907 2111.50 { 55+, A9s, J9s+, T8s+, 97s+, 86s+, 75s+, 65s } [/ QUOTE ] Where the hell did you get this range? what about 22-44? What about offsuit broadways? What about Ax hands? wtf? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
what shpanko said...
You narrowed the flop range ridiculously and we STILL have good equity...Im not a math guy so can somebody calculate what % of the time villain would have to fold to a flop bet USING BILBO'S RANGE for our c-bet to be profitable. Use $12 as a c-bet amount. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] c-bet please. [/ QUOTE ] C-betting is terrible here, man. Here's a stove of random [censored] that doesn't even include club draws: Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 76,230 games 0.003 secs 25,410,000 games/sec Board: 7h 9c 8c Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 34.385% 31.61% 02.77% 24100 2111.50 { 6c6d } Hand 1: 65.615% 62.85% 02.77% 47907 2111.50 { 55+, A9s, J9s+, T8s+, 97s+, 86s+, 75s+, 65s } [/ QUOTE ] Where the hell did you get this range? what about 22-44? What about offsuit broadways? What about Ax hands? wtf? [/ QUOTE ] Dude, that's a CALLING range. Notice that it is a humongous portion of his total range, so don't get me started at how batting is +EV because he folds so much. I see your "WTF"? and raise you a much bigger "WTF". You don't need to mindlessly Cbet every [censored] pot. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
[ QUOTE ]
what shpanko said... You narrowed the flop range ridiculously and we STILL have good equity...Im not a math guy so can somebody calculate what % of the time villain would have to fold to a flop bet USING BILBO'S RANGE for our c-bet to be profitable. Use $12 as a c-bet amount. [/ QUOTE ] Again, that's a calling range. Villain's probably only folding 22-55 and unsuited big cards. This is a small percentage of his range. Cmon, THINK. He cold-called. What percentage of his range is big cards with no draw and 22-55? Cause that's all he's folding. I guarantee it isn't the 35% of his range that you need for a bet to be +EV. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
You think unsuited broadway cards are not a big part of an "unremarkable"'s range? I guess I disagree there.
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ric Flair says Whooooooooooo
That is a horrible calling range for a random 200NL fish.
|
|
|