#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
nt! won fair and square. time to welcome in the new regime
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I only have 1 person on ignore, and he never posts in forums I use anyway. I'd have 2, but you can't put mods on ignore (and no, I don't mean Diddy). [/ QUOTE ] i was about to say yeah me too but then i looked and i have 6 people on ignore as it is [/ QUOTE ] you still have me on ignore? (go big blue?) |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
that poll needs 4 options. just stop trying so hard.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
no and yes, respectively
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
diebitter,
stop flirting with me, i wasn't even talking to you ldo. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
[ QUOTE ]
diebitter, stop flirting with me, i wasn't even talking to you ldo. [/ QUOTE ] Well okay, but only if you promise to do that thing you did for me at last year's mod Christmas Party at this year's mod Christmas Party. You know what I'm talkin about. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
no i'm serious leave me the [censored] alone
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
NT!
3 21% dids 2 14% diebitter 4 29% tuq 4 29% .5 0 0% BASTARD! 1 07 Lols how does .5 have no votes. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
go diddy
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LOL dids
+43 but indy is driving THIS COULD BE CLOSE
|
|
|