|
|
#31
09-05-2007, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Grimstarr \"ravished by four queens\"
all you little boys need to stop posting about Grimstarr for awhile and do your homewok now, school started again.
|
|
#32
09-05-2007, 04:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Grimstarr \"ravished by four queens\"
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravished Couldn't be ravaged: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravaged [/ QUOTE ] The QQQQ beat him, and therefore ravaged would be far more apt, so saying, "couldn't be ravaged" is wholly inaccurate, but the poetic license is yours, even if used wrecklessly....
|
|
#33
09-05-2007, 04:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Grimstarr \"ravished by four queens\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravished Couldn't be ravaged: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravaged [/ QUOTE ] The QQQQ beat him, and therefore ravaged would be far more apt, so saying, "couldn't be ravaged" is wholly inaccurate, but the poetic license is yours, even if used wrecklessly.... [/ QUOTE ] No, because that would kill the pun on Queens. DUCY?
|
|
#34
09-05-2007, 04:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Grimstarr \"ravished by four queens\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravished Couldn't be ravaged: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravaged [/ QUOTE ] The QQQQ beat him, and therefore ravaged would be far more apt, so saying, "couldn't be ravaged" is wholly inaccurate, but the poetic license is yours, even if used wrecklessly.... [/ QUOTE ] No, because that would kill the pun on Queens. DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] jesus christ you are a mongoloid, sir
|
|
#35
09-05-2007, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Grimstarr \"ravished by four queens\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravished Couldn't be ravaged: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravaged [/ QUOTE ] The QQQQ beat him, and therefore ravaged would be far more apt, so saying, "couldn't be ravaged" is wholly inaccurate, but the poetic license is yours, even if used wrecklessly.... [/ QUOTE ] No, because that would kill the pun on Queens. DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] Ugh, nm.
|
|
#36
09-05-2007, 04:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Grimstarr \"ravished by four queens\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravished Couldn't be ravaged: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ravaged [/ QUOTE ] The QQQQ beat him, and therefore ravaged would be far more apt, so saying, "couldn't be ravaged" is wholly inaccurate, but the poetic license is yours, even if used wrecklessly.... [/ QUOTE ] No, because that would kill the pun on Queens. DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] jesus christ you are a mongoloid, sir [/ QUOTE ] What?
|
|
#38
09-05-2007, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Grimstarr \"ravished by four queens\"
[ QUOTE ]
I'll have to check thru history to make sure, but it's possible Mongoloids killed Punan Queens. [/ QUOTE ] hes halfway there, it requires quite an intellectual leap from this point...
|
|
#39
09-05-2007, 05:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Grimstarr \"ravished by four queens\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'll have to check thru history to make sure, but it's possible Mongoloids killed Punan Queens. [/ QUOTE ] hes halfway there, it requires quite an intellectual leap from this point... [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Not for the first time, I bet. [/ QUOTE ]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
