#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
how is buffalo an underdog? [/ QUOTE ] the jets suck, but Buffalo sucks more |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
The pats caught more TD's last week than the skins receivers have all year. Didn't Moss bench himself?
Yes they have a decent defense, but Arizona and their 1 armed QB put up like 300 yards on them. I watch almost every game, excpet when it's a pathetic team like the raiders. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] how is buffalo an underdog? [/ QUOTE ] the jets suck, but Buffalo sucks more [/ QUOTE ] |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] they had dallas beat up until the final second, and they just beat baltimore fwiw. [/ QUOTE ] LoL could you say anything more square? [/ QUOTE ] If not for awful offensive play calling, they would have beat dallas. Without Lossman in there they are a better team, and should stick it to the jets. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
lol thats not saying much our receivers dont have a td yet this year
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
i was counting TE's as receivers.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
i'd pound washington -17 but w/e. for all this talk about the patriots covering every game, the browns game was a backdoor cover, and washington actually has a defense.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
I'll book your washington -17, for however much you want.
The browns have a decent team this year, and still have a chance of winning their division if Pitt stumbles. Yes they were lucky to cover that game. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
lol we'll see
|
|
|