Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > MOD DISCUSSION
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2007, 12:43 AM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: Stars Conclusion (short answer = void is owned)

[ QUOTE ]
If I was him I would crash course my sister in tournament poker 24/7 for as long as it takes to make it plausable and take stars to court gangsta-style!

[/ QUOTE ]
lol. Which court?
  #2  
Old 10-16-2007, 04:25 AM
saraya saraya is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8
Default Re: Stars Conclusion (short answer = void is owned)

first of all im not mark teltscher, let a OP check up my IP adress and they can link me to Las Vegas, Bellagio. Mark Teltscher lives in London, UK. further than that mark teltscher was just in barcelona, and he's probably sleeping right now. I'm just here from an above perspective since everybody seems to think that the right thing to do was to disqualify the void, im just saying what doesnt point out 200 other players in this tournament should be disqualified as well?, seems to me like people want to disqualify the void just because they dont like Mark Teltscher? this is not about hate or love, its about doing the right thing, anyhow of course im sure pokerstars made a good investigation I just dont understand how they can prove anyone guilty without evidence enough? in fact the account The Void was not multiaccounting, what could be worse than multiaccounting ?
  #3  
Old 10-16-2007, 05:03 AM
Peleus Peleus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 317
Default Re: Stars Conclusion (short answer = void is owned)

[ QUOTE ]
first of all im not mark teltscher, let a OP check up my IP adress and they can link me to Las Vegas, Bellagio. Mark Teltscher lives in London, UK. further than that mark teltscher was just in barcelona, and he's probably sleeping right now. I'm just here from an above perspective since everybody seems to think that the right thing to do was to disqualify the void, im just saying what doesnt point out 200 other players in this tournament should be disqualified as well?, seems to me like people want to disqualify the void just because they dont like Mark Teltscher? this is not about hate or love, its about doing the right thing, anyhow of course im sure pokerstars made a good investigation I just dont understand how they can prove anyone guilty without evidence enough? in fact the account The Void was not multiaccounting, what could be worse than multiaccounting ?

[/ QUOTE ]

I have no idea who thevoid is, or why people dislike him but I completely disagree with you. You're argument is going along the same lines of a drugs cheat athlete should not be stripped of their medals, because there are probably some other drug cheats out there that weren't good enough to win it.

Yeah there probably are other poker cheaters out there, however it should only be fair that if they are caught they suffer the same consequences. Obviously being successful brings more motivation to check out a single person, and I think this is great for online poker knowing that if you're multi accounting and score big, you will just loose it anyway.

Stars should not, and will not reveal the investigation behind the matter. They have no reason to lie, they have no financial gain, no motive. All revealing details potentially does is give away private information of the parties involved, and potentially make it harder to detect multi accouters in the future as they know what techniques are used to investigate them.

Well done stars for putting some integrity into the realm of online poker, where it is needed at the moment.
  #4  
Old 10-16-2007, 05:37 AM
xxThe_Lebowskixx xxThe_Lebowskixx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indeed.
Posts: 3,784
Default Re: Stars Conclusion (short answer = void is owned)

thevoid = DB?
  #5  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:34 AM
jimpo jimpo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 128
Posts: 684
Default Re: Stars Conclusion (short answer = void is owned)

[ QUOTE ]
first of all im not mark teltscher, let a OP check up my IP adress and they can link me to Las Vegas, Bellagio.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do I count? I have made some posts in the micro-NL forum, I believe. But how do I check up an IP adress??+

Confusing.
  #6  
Old 10-16-2007, 11:07 AM
Harvester Harvester is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 39
Default Re: Stars Conclusion (short answer = void is owned)

I would like to ask one question on this subject, I wonder if I missed this but I don't see it being addressed.

Was PS informed of the player as a suspect from other players, or were they investigating and finding this on their own accord?

In the past this all came evident from other players being upset or concerned who played in the event or knew the players.

I don't even know if this is a known variable, just curious as to how this came around.
  #7  
Old 10-16-2007, 11:20 AM
Quanah Parker Quanah Parker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stoc:N2SmokNbears
Posts: 1,762
Default Re: Stars Conclusion (short answer = void is owned)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If I was him I would crash course my sister in tournament poker 24/7 for as long as it takes to make it plausable and take stars to court gangsta-style!

[/ QUOTE ]
lol. Which court?

[/ QUOTE ]
The basketball court, the only court recognized by the tru gangsta.
I hear Stars has some mean hops, so watch out.
  #8  
Old 10-17-2007, 03:40 PM
Ultra Violet Ultra Violet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 90
Default Re: Stars Conclusion (short answer = void is owned)

I laugh every time I read "theVoid" because it makes me think of the whole annoying Domino's "Avoid the Noid" campaign...

Maybe someone can make some catchy t-shirts with the thread title to keep the drama alive... There are so many options, starting with the new thread title from Dids or maybe "da Void be voided."
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.