Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: ...?
Check 4 5.48%
1/3 6 8.22%
1/2 25 34.25%
Push 38 52.05%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-18-2007, 09:38 AM
vin17 vin17 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 767
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
The Jays can contend, but the rotation is scary. If everyone stays healthy it could be decent, but none of the guys in the rotation have been able to do that.

[/ QUOTE ]
QFT. You'd have to think JP is competent to realize that the rotation, as it stands now, won't be getting them into any playoffs. He needs to do what he has to to get that 180IP #3 starter. Although doing that would put them back to where they were at before Lilly left.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-18-2007, 11:37 AM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The Jays can contend, but the rotation is scary. If everyone stays healthy it could be decent, but none of the guys in the rotation have been able to do that.

[/ QUOTE ]
QFT. You'd have to think JP is competent to realize that the rotation, as it stands now, won't be getting them into any playoffs. He needs to do what he has to to get that 180IP #3 starter. Although doing that would put them back to where they were at before Lilly left.

[/ QUOTE ]

See that's what I have been trying to say. A #3 starter who pitches 180 innings is a very valuable commodity.
As of know our rotation of Halladay, Burnett, Chacin, Thomson, Any of like 12 people. Is a pretty good rotation.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-18-2007, 08:53 PM
Golden_Rhino Golden_Rhino is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nowhere Fast
Posts: 3,879
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The Jays can contend, but the rotation is scary. If everyone stays healthy it could be decent, but none of the guys in the rotation have been able to do that.

[/ QUOTE ]
QFT. You'd have to think JP is competent to realize that the rotation, as it stands now, won't be getting them into any playoffs. He needs to do what he has to to get that 180IP #3 starter. Although doing that would put them back to where they were at before Lilly left.

[/ QUOTE ]

See that's what I have been trying to say. A #3 starter who pitches 180 innings is a very valuable commodity.
As of know our rotation of Halladay, Burnett, Chacin, Thomson, Any of like 12 people. Is a pretty good rotation.

[/ QUOTE ]

That rotation is Halladay and then wing and a prayer. They could win the World Series with that rotation, or get 100 losses with it. As a Jays fan I would breathe a little easier if JP can somehow get just one reliable arm.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-18-2007, 09:44 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

Other than health, I don't think anyone should have any concerns with Halliday, Burnett and Chacin. 4th and 5th starters and the middle relief will define the Jays this year.

I know Boston improved its team in the offseason, but they will be lucky to have the same record as last year. The 1st half of the season the Red Sox had last year saw them having way more than their share or miracle comebacks, and that couldn't last forever.

Yankees 102-60
Jays (WC)98-64
Red Sox 81-81
Tampa 80-82
Orioles 70-92
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-18-2007, 10:16 PM
kolotoure kolotoure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raising the flop
Posts: 8,167
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

lol @ that
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-18-2007, 10:25 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

Motorholdem,
Saying other than health, Burnett and Chacin is fine is like saying other than klling the millions of people Hitler wasn't all that bad.

Also for a #4 starter John Thomson has very good peripherals.

Your records for the AL east are so fair off. Are you aware of how many divisional games teams play?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-18-2007, 10:29 PM
Golden_Rhino Golden_Rhino is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nowhere Fast
Posts: 3,879
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Other than health, I don't think anyone should have any concerns with Halliday, Burnett and Chacin. 4th and 5th starters and the middle relief will define the Jays this year.

I know Boston improved its team in the offseason, but they will be lucky to have the same record as last year. The 1st half of the season the Red Sox had last year saw them having way more than their share or miracle comebacks, and that couldn't last forever.

Yankees 102-60
Jays (WC)98-64
Red Sox 81-81
Tampa 80-82
Orioles 70-92

[/ QUOTE ]

Burnett has been a .500 pitcher his whole career. I watched him a lot last year, and he seems like one of those guys that will always make you say "Next year he will be better". I actually have a little more faith in Chacin. If his health stays decent, the kid could be a player. He gives up a lot of runs, but manages to win his fair share (not in the same league, but think of him as a very poor man's Jack Morris).
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-18-2007, 10:59 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Motorholdem,
Saying other than health, Burnett and Chacin is fine is like saying other than klling the millions of people Hitler wasn't all that bad.

Also for a #4 starter John Thomson has very good peripherals.

Your records for the AL east are so fair off. Are you aware of how many divisional games teams play?

[/ QUOTE ]

Some rotations are awful, even if they stay healthy all year. Would you like a potfull of Josh Towers all year, or would you hope his arm fell off?

Health is a major issue for the Jays, because, as you know, Halliday, Burnett and Chacin all had problems last year.

I've never seen a pitching rotation's health compared to Hitler's killings, but if anyone wanted to make that leap I guess it would be you, Pudge.

Oh and gee, do the AL East teams play each other lots. That would explain all those Tampa Bay games.

Sober up
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-18-2007, 11:29 PM
kolotoure kolotoure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raising the flop
Posts: 8,167
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

They won't win 88 games nevermind 98 games
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-18-2007, 11:54 PM
Scary_Tiger Scary_Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,590
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

motorholdem, you realize "4th and 5th starters" get twice as many starts as Halladay? (if YOU are lucky) Schilling/Matsuzaka/Papelbon/Beckett/Wakefield/Lester and Mussina/Pettitte/Wang/Igawa/Pavano/Hughes are both huge edges over Halladay/Burnett/Chacin. Depth is very important to putting together 90 win seasons, and 4th and 5th starters aren't even depth. They're part of your team that's contributing a ton.

I expect the aging Yankees and the young and talented Blue Jays to outhit the Red Sox this year, but the edge here isn't anywhere near the edge in the starting rotation. Crisp/Lugo/Ortiz/Manny/Drew/Lowell/Youks/Varitek/Pedroia is still pretty powerful, although the bottom two spots are basically a black hole.

In the bullpen, I'm very positive with the Blue Jays, they have the best and deepest bullpen, the Yankees still have Mo, and the Red Sox are basically piecing it together.

Just the same, the Jays simply won't be able to overcome having a 5 man rotation with only 3 pitchers.

Edit: Missed Thomson signing but he isn't near as good as any of the 15 pitchers listed.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.