#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
your clearly shoving and thats easily the right play, anyone else who thinks the opposite is completely wrong
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
I would 3 bet and go broke here. [/ QUOTE ] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
This "we've got so little invested" is starting to really irritate me. Make it $240-270.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
calling is fine, 3 betting and calling a shove is pretty bad
I dont really like 3betting because they can represent a lot of hands on the river, any club, spade,9/k,A/6 is a bad card. So I call and see what happens on the river. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
bet flop
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
I dont really like 3betting because they can represent a lot of hands on the river, any club, spade,9/k,A/6 is a bad card. So I call and see what happens on the river. [/ QUOTE ] what? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
Looks like BB probably hit a lower 2p on the turn, and CO looks like a combo draw with clubs. Pop it up, big.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
its easier to call a bet of $150 on the river than a shove when you bloat the pot on the turn and check one of the 20+ scarecards
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
Optimal play = AI
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
I def. 3 bet/call. Anything else is pretty bad
|
|
|