![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
got norv?
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had Colts -4 and under 47.5. The game went mostly how I figured it would except for Sproles
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Refs just cost Indy the game.
Vinatieri is so clutch. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hahahaha Norv hands ball to Lorenzo Neal trying to run out clock on first down. Genius level play-calling.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Teasers [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So when the team I bet on runs two kicks back for TDs, the other team turns it over 6 times, and I'm still a late TD away from not covering, it's that what's known as "sucking out"?
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
So when the team I bet on runs two kicks back for TDs, the other team turns it over 6 times, and I'm still a late TD away from not covering, it's that what's known as "sucking out"? [/ QUOTE ] [x] Sucked out |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SD looked horrible. indy would win this game 95% of the time. GJ to those who picked SD tho.
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
SD looked horrible. indy would win this game 95% of the time. GJ to those who picked SD tho. [/ QUOTE ] is this the sports betting version of "you couldn't have played that hand worse, but nice hand" |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] SD looked horrible. indy would win this game 95% of the time. GJ to those who picked SD tho. [/ QUOTE ] is this the sports betting version of "you couldn't have played that hand worse, but nice hand" [/ QUOTE ] Yeah. SD barely won despite winning every luckament. |
![]() |
|
|