Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Community
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:27 PM
N 82 50 24 N 82 50 24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: thepokerdb
Posts: 4,196
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

Buy-in Played ROI Expectation Winnings Buy-in Rake Profit

$150 214 -18% -$29 $28,368 $32,100 $2,568 -$6,300

http://www.bluffmagazine.com/thepoke...asp?tid=154980

PokerStars -
Tourney ID: 20002201 Buy-in: $150+12 Players: 586
Game Type: NL Hold'em Rebuys: 0 Add-ons: 0
Start Time: 2/20/2006 - 21:10 End Time: 2/21/2006 - 02:24 Prize Pool: $87,900
Place Username Payout
1. shaniac $21,975
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:28 PM
TheNewf TheNewf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,434
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

[ QUOTE ]
i'm a losing mtt player on every site but ftp now

[/ QUOTE ]

Brag: 3.83% ROI on Stars.
Beat: -9% ROI over 108 $100 rebuys despite winning it once.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:30 PM
BadgerPro BadgerPro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: There\'s only one... BadgerPro!
Posts: 5,679
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

[ QUOTE ]
Beat: -9% ROI over 108 $100 rebuys despite winning it once.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're pretty much down the rake.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:33 PM
JSchnett JSchnett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Looking for people to stake
Posts: 4,360
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

brag: up 85K+ in $162s,
beat: down a [censored] in $215s/320s
variance: break even in $530s and 1ks
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:43 PM
Hoop Addict Hoop Addict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 428
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

[ QUOTE ]
Buy-in Played ROI Expectation Winnings Buy-in Rake Profit

$150 214 -18% -$29 $28,368 $32,100 $2,568 -$6,300

http://www.bluffmagazine.com/thepoke...asp?tid=154980

PokerStars -
Tourney ID: 20002201 Buy-in: $150+12 Players: 586
Game Type: NL Hold'em Rebuys: 0 Add-ons: 0
Start Time: 2/20/2006 - 21:10 End Time: 2/21/2006 - 02:24 Prize Pool: $87,900
Place Username Payout
1. shaniac $21,975

[/ QUOTE ]

Ty Nat. You're a gun.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:43 PM
TheNewf TheNewf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,434
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Beat: -9% ROI over 108 $100 rebuys despite winning it once.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're pretty much down the rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

At the risk of being a nit, the rake is a much smaller % in those. I've never paid much attention to my actual results, partly because I want to believe I'm better than they would lead me to believe, and partly because I realize they're basically meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:52 PM
BadgerPro BadgerPro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: There\'s only one... BadgerPro!
Posts: 5,679
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

[ QUOTE ]
At the risk of being a nit, the rake is a much smaller % in those.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, forgot the 'rebuy' part kills the rake %... whoops.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05-10-2007, 11:10 PM
Sherman Sherman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ph. D. School
Posts: 3,999
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

Okay, using a measure beyond ROI, I get the following for JohnnyBax only using his Stars Results:

Buyins less than $110. Also includes $55 Rebuys. Total tournaments = 1798.

Bax is 4.01 Times more likely than random chance to win a tournament on average. Using a 95% CI, his upper limit is 5.92 and his lower limit is 2.68 times more likely than random chance to win the tournament. For those who don't know...this is damn good.

Buyins over $110 (includes $109 rebuys). For a total of 1202 tournaments.

Bax is 2.13 Times more likely than random chance to win a tournament on average. Using a 95% CI, his upper limit is 3.55 and his lower limit is 1.26 times more likely than random chance to win the tournament. Pretty good evidence that he is a winning player even at this buy-in level.

Note that these estimates are representative of size of field.

End debate.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 05-11-2007, 09:54 AM
Dawg24 Dawg24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 157
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

shermn...

can you explain these numbers and where they come from....I find it very interesting.

ty
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 05-11-2007, 11:11 AM
burningyen burningyen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: avoiding practice
Posts: 2,324
Default Re: The Bax Limit Theorem

[ QUOTE ]
This is not some sample size issue, this is over 400 tourneys....

[/ QUOTE ]
lol?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.