Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:24 PM
EMc EMc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LETS GO YANKEES!!
Posts: 7,663
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

Thac is not calling with a Q here PF IMO
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:36 PM
Hail Eris Hail Eris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 663
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

[ QUOTE ]

u check and he bets n e non pair hands here and some smaller pairs as well. he will also likely bet Qx but i doubt he has many combos of Qx here. so imo his range is a few random draws, low pps, and then a few Qx hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

So his range for betting is flushes, Qs, draws, and air. Surely this is an argument for C/R, not C/C, especially since every river is gross and playing correctly is impossible. The only problem is that he shouldn't really have a Queen from PF, and even if he does, this is a pretty standard pot control spot, no?

I think B/C is not insane here. B/F is obviously the worst line by far, since he's raising like almost his entire range (the only question is, how much of it is bluffs/semibluffs). Even if he doesn't raise, you're still beat, because it means he has a Q.

C/F is obviously perfectly fine. I see a villain description of "17/14", "straightforward", and "abc". None of this really inclines me to play for stacks on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:36 PM
Xanta Xanta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kingston, ON
Posts: 1,937
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

No QK or QJ? I would think those are def in his range pre, maybe I'm wrong, never played with him.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:39 PM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

Please don't tell me you are calling with KQ and JQ in this spot.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:51 PM
Xanta Xanta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kingston, ON
Posts: 1,937
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

Preflop I'll call with KQs and QJs intending to steal a lot of pots from position if the openers got a PFR of over 16/17 or so, don't see anything wrong with that. Obviously it's better from a CO/Button situation but I think it's fine for thac here.

BTW I would never c/r turn without a sick read on how villain plays draws, but I think it's worth at least a bit of thought.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:56 PM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

How exactly do you steal? Call the flop UI and pray he does not second barrel? Ever worried about ROI? Tried 3betting those hands instead? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Calling CO opening with KQs is even worse.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-30-2007, 12:00 AM
Profish2285 Profish2285 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,936
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

corsakh, you always 3 bet or fold KQ pf?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-30-2007, 12:01 AM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

Pretty much always. I might call a maniac.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-30-2007, 12:02 AM
kaz2107 kaz2107 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hating CO pro sports atm
Posts: 2,943
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

u check and he bets n e non pair hands here and some smaller pairs as well. he will also likely bet Qx but i doubt he has many combos of Qx here. so imo his range is a few random draws, low pps, and then a few Qx hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

So his range for betting is flushes, Qs, draws, and air. Surely this is an argument for C/R, not C/C, especially since every river is gross and playing correctly is impossible. The only problem is that he shouldn't really have a Queen from PF, and even if he does, this is a pretty standard pot control spot, no?

I think B/C is not insane here. B/F is obviously the worst line by far, since he's raising like almost his entire range (the only question is, how much of it is bluffs/semibluffs). Even if he doesn't raise, you're still beat, because it means he has a Q.

C/F is obviously perfectly fine. I see a villain description of "17/14", "straightforward", and "abc". None of this really inclines me to play for stacks on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]cr...??? wut hands is he calling a cr on the turn with that we beat??? hmmm i cant name n e except maybe a fd (havent looked at wut odds he would b gettin n stuff but blah at that)
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-30-2007, 12:02 AM
Profish2285 Profish2285 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,936
Default Re: JJ vs. thac - NL$100

Well I mean I dont usually 3 bet KQ against people from the first two spots without a good read so I guess this is a fold pre flop then.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.