Moving In With Deuces

[fsoyars]

unless it's a satelite, the top 9 get tickets and one other player is extremely shortstacked and about to be in the big blind... and asleep.

[betgo]

[ QUOTE ]
Seems to, considering antes and an opponent that will call with any two.

Brings up a question, though, is it +cEV to call with 22 if SB is moving in with any 2?

So the antes create an artificial situation where both are correct.

[/ QUOTE ]
If SB is moving in with two, calling with 22 is easily cEV+. Calling with 22 is probably cEV+ against many opponents not pushing any two. Obviously cEV != $EV, but I don't want to get into that issue any further.

[FortunaMaximus]

Wasn't the nature of my inquiry. Thanks, man.

[betgo]

[ QUOTE ]
Wasn't the nature of my inquiry. Thanks, man.

[/ QUOTE ]
You specificaly asked me to answer your question. Did the best I could.

[FortunaMaximus]

You answered my main question, yes, and that's all I wanted. I don't think the cEV != $EV part is too relevant to the discussion anyway.

[nath]

What it comes down to is that since moving in is clearly +EV, some situation needs to arise which causes raising a lesser amount to be more so. Or some weird satellite situation which makes folding the best play of all.
You guys can figure out what exactly that is.

[stupidsucker]

unless someone is all in for the $1 ante.

[jon_1van]

unless BB is a bonehead and will fold everything but his very good hands to significantly smaller raise. And the hands he plays he pushes over top...allowing you to fold when he has a monster...but take the pot uncontested when he doesn't have a monster.

[Dave D]

OMG OMG OMG I will forever be known as the guy who actually got Sklansky to change a mistake he makes.

he said "dueces" instead of "two dueces."

See other thread about a simple question for proof. Also, proof that Sklansky does actually read responses after he posts.

I win.

[HerbieGRD]

It is Omaha, you have four of them and BB will always call?