#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: They might as well call it Turnstars
[ QUOTE ]
LOL OMG I GOT BAD BEAT FOR A BUNCH OF PLAY MONIESSS CHIPS [/ QUOTE ] LOL donkaments but really, who gives a [censored]? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: They might as well call it Turnstars
[ QUOTE ]
Every one who says this is a bad BBV post just doesn't understand tournament poker. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is agreeable to both parties. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: They might as well call it Turnstars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] LOL OMG I GOT BAD BEAT FOR A BUNCH OF PLAY MONIESSS CHIPS [/ QUOTE ] LOL donkaments but really, who gives a [censored]? [/ QUOTE ] This is my favorite post in this thread |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: They might as well call it Turnstars
I'm no donkament expert, but couldn't it be beneficial to keep a 4th player in while you are the chip leader because people tend to play passive while on the bubble, allowing you to steal lots of blinds?
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: They might as well call it Turnstars
I'm bumping this because it's pretty much the only good thread I've ever started and I don't want it to get lost to the archives.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: They might as well call it Turnstars
thing is this isn't a good thread. A good level needs to have an element of doubt involved so people (other than morons) actually fall for it or at least acknowledge the possibility of it not being a level.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: They might as well call it Turnstars
ummmm...not computing
|
|
|