Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-12-2007, 11:50 PM
daveT daveT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: disproving SAGE
Posts: 2,458
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NLTP:

"By playing a strictly algarithmic style of pushing all in with 77 + and AJ+, you can beat all but the toughest games."

[/ QUOTE ]

This looks silly when taken out of context. He's referencing a small stack strategy from Ed Miller's book Getting Started in Hold'em to emphasize the intrinsic advantage of having a small stack. What David is saying happens to be true when you buy into a deep-stacked game with a short stack. This is backed up by many hours logged by Ed Miller using this strategy himself.

Also, NLHTAP goes on to read that although this strategy has a modest expectation it is a surefire way for a pro to slash his winrate.

[/ QUOTE ]

There was a discussion about this a while back, when I introduced a short-stack strategy (far more effective, but perhaps not as mindless) One person said that he used the above strategy for 100,000 hands and broke even. I hope winning expectation is a little better than this.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-13-2007, 12:34 AM
Brocktoon Brocktoon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
The probability of hitting quads on the flop when you hold a pair only 8-1 maybe i should re-think how i play small pairs

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, can you read? Read your original quote and then read your last post. See the difference?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:57 AM
Al Mirpuri Al Mirpuri is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tiltville, Louisana
Posts: 2,294
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
al, i live in montana which is wild like alaska but much warmer. so in essence i live in a baked alaska.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-16-2007, 06:56 PM
SpaghettiMonster SpaghettiMonster is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 3
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle Brunson said prayer cures cancer in Super/System

[/ QUOTE ]

In his case it did.

RZ

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, modern medicine is a big joke.

[/ QUOTE ]


Go research Doyles case, There was no modern medicial cure. The Doctors told him there was nothing they could do.

RZ

[/ QUOTE ]

Little did Doyle know that his guardian faun snuck into his bedroom and placed a mandrake root in a bowl of fresh milk under his bed, feeding it two drops of blood a day until the cancer disappeared. That's what really cured him, the prayer thing is just crazy talk.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're insane. He was touched by my noodly appendage, and obviously got well.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-16-2007, 07:34 PM
KurtSF KurtSF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,983
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
The probability of hitting quads on the flop when you hold a pair only 8-1 maybe i should re-think how i play small pairs

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think its math that is your issue here.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-16-2007, 07:58 PM
Packard Packard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MARS
Posts: 861
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

Most surprising blunder was Roy Cooke Play of Hands II.

Roy was in a set over set confrontation where Roy Cooke had
pocket 9's and opponent had pocket JJ

Flop came down J92 and Roy got into a raising war with his opponent.

Roy said that he had never seen one in 20+ years of playing poker? Was he serious? How did that get into print. The rest of the book is excellent though
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-16-2007, 08:15 PM
Quadstriker Quadstriker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,677
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
The probability of hitting quads on the flop when you hold a pair only 8-1 maybe i should re-think how i play small pairs

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you should retake 6th grade english class instead.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.