|
|
#31
11-26-2006, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a TLK vs Jeff Lissandro hand
i dont play 1k/2k, but i do play a lot of 200/400 HU and no one, and i mean NO ONE in these games ever bet/folds the river. TLK's play is horrible. he was probably tilting, as someone else said.
|
|
#32
11-26-2006, 03:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a TLK vs Jeff Lissandro hand
actually, with that said, TLK could have made the move for metagame, in the way that he wanted to see what and if he could make Jeff fold on the river (that way he'll know when he can get more value in a river c/r if he's called, or if he can keep river c/r bluffing if Jeff folds). i think this explanation makes more sense than tilt.
|
|
#33
11-26-2006, 04:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a TLK vs Jeff Lissandro hand
Ok, my question is kinda stupid, forget about it.
If no one ever bet folds river, that should be very exploitable, or not?
|
|
#34
11-26-2006, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a TLK vs Jeff Lissandro hand
[ QUOTE ]
If no one ever bet folds river, that should be very exploitable, or not? [/ QUOTE ] well i'm talking in general. when top players (or the top player vs a v. good player, as was the case here) play each other, the advantage is to the guy who can keep changing gears one step ahead of his opponent. so if TLK was c/ring for value constantly, and never bluffing, he could theoretically start bluffing in those spots IF Jeff realizes that it's always big hands and starts folding. and then there's a counter to that, and so on. in isolation hands like these don't mean too much, IMO.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
