|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: what is my destiny? | |||
| heel |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| face |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| BASTARD! |
  
|
2 | 40.00% |
| ship it holla trollas |
  
|
3 | 60.00% |
| Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#371
10-06-2007, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
Brag: I moved to Atlanta today.
Beat: I moved to Atlanta today. Variance: I moved to Atlanta today. |
|
#373
10-06-2007, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This isn't true. Just because someone is playing at a low-stakes level doesn't mean he automatically has leaks. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] So, you are telling me it's possible for someone playing low stakes sngs to play perfectly? [/ QUOTE ] Devin, you ruined it. Should've quoted it again. |
|
#374
10-06-2007, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This isn't true. Just because someone is playing at a low-stakes level doesn't mean he automatically has leaks. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] So, you are telling me it's possible for someone playing low stakes sngs to play perfectly? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know if this is semantics/leveling or not, but if you believe it's possible for anybody to play "perfectly" then yes of course it's possible that for whatever reason one of those perfect players could be temporarily playing low stakes. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. |
|
#375
10-06-2007, 08:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This isn't true. Just because someone is playing at a low-stakes level doesn't mean he automatically has leaks. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] So, you are telling me it's possible for someone playing low stakes sngs to play perfectly? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know if this is semantics/leveling or not, but if you believe it's possible for anybody to play "perfectly" then yes of course it's possible that for whatever reason one of those perfect players could be temporarily playing low stakes. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. |
|
#376
10-06-2007, 08:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This isn't true. Just because someone is playing at a low-stakes level doesn't mean he automatically has leaks. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] So, you are telling me it's possible for someone playing low stakes sngs to play perfectly? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know if this is semantics/leveling or not, but if you believe it's possible for anybody to play "perfectly" then yes of course it's possible that for whatever reason one of those perfect players could be temporarily playing low stakes. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This is true. |
|
#377
10-06-2007, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This isn't true. Just because someone is playing at a low-stakes level doesn't mean he automatically has leaks. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] So, you are telling me it's possible for someone playing low stakes sngs to play perfectly? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know if this is semantics/leveling or not, but if you believe it's possible for anybody to play "perfectly" then yes of course it's possible that for whatever reason one of those perfect players could be temporarily playing low stakes. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This is true. [/ QUOTE ] This is true NOT!!!! |
|
#378
10-06-2007, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
y'all are being stupid.
obviously, a very good player wouldn't spend long at the 3.40s. obviously, it is possible for a very good player to load up a 3.40 SNG. obviously, it is highly unlikely that a poster asking about his finish distribution (!!!) is playing perfect poker obviously, asking a question on the basis of your finish distribution is a sign that you have some decent flaws in your game. |
|
#379
10-06-2007, 09:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] anyone here think its possible to be on a 7000 game sng losing streak and still be a 'great' or even good player? clearly at lower limits the answer is NO. what about higher/highest limits? [/ QUOTE ] Good thing there is no point in answering that question because you would kill yourself before that happens. FYP whatever that means! [/ QUOTE ] AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#380
10-06-2007, 09:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This isn't true. Just because someone is playing at a low-stakes level doesn't mean he automatically has leaks. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] So, you are telling me it's possible for someone playing low stakes sngs to play perfectly? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know if this is semantics/leveling or not, but if you believe it's possible for anybody to play "perfectly" then yes of course it's possible that for whatever reason one of those perfect players could be temporarily playing low stakes. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. [/ QUOTE ] This is true. [/ QUOTE ] This is true NOT!!!! [/ QUOTE ] I find this analysis somewhat truthful. |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
