La Pucelle Werewolf GAME THREAD

[DustinG]

ja

[Neil S]

[ QUOTE ]
<- reconfirms

I also suggest taking away the evil's ability to stop a lynch.

[/ QUOTE ]I think Baal has to stay in because he's an anti-roleclaim mechanism.

[CPFB]

dmk,

I really didn't want to vote for you. I thought that Dustin was the angel for some strange reason. I thought he was telling me to night kill him so that he wouldn't die and we'd have confirmed angel who'd be invincible. (I also forgot about the wolves being able to change one lynch target, so I guess that's not entirely true.)

I'm sorry about all that. I really didn't think you were a wolf, but I couldn't vote for Dustin and test my theory out.

As stated above, I suck.

[Siegmund]

Well, hey, no worries about how much time we'll have for the game over the weekend.

[lastchance]

Yeah, there's no chance village wins this game.

And you know what? I adapt, yo.

And since when does posting good logic make a player more villagery? It doesn't. It really doesn't. (Ok, I'm BSing here, but it's so goddamn player-specific, lol).

Works for like 30+% of the players in POG? And pretty much only for people who are good at finding wolves?

And considering it's dmk on d1, I'm never using that logic/thinking read on him?

That said, not posting content, and completely BSing is wolfy, but I know Dustin well enough to know that he's not completely BSing here (or he could be BSing as a villager, either one).

And dmk, power villagers do sound wolfy, yo.

[Neil S]

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, there's no chance village wins this game.

And you know what? I adapt, yo.

And since when does posting good logic make a player more villagery? It doesn't. It really doesn't. (Ok, I'm BSing here, but it's so goddamn player-specific, lol).

[/ QUOTE ]One less wolf. Ehh... maybe I'll try running again someday after all.

I know I've defanged Alouette too much and put in too many wolves. Plus maybe I need to make Croix not get converted by NK, hmmm.

[DustinG]

[ QUOTE ]
but I know Dustin well enough to know that he's not completely BSing here (or he could be BSing as a villager, either one).


[/ QUOTE ]

not sure what you mean here. I've never gone after someone I didnt think was a wolf as a villager.

I understand some of the arguments for it, but im not sure I agree with them.

I really did think he was evil, but I realized late last night he doesn't make the argument he had against Nich if he was evil.

[lastchance]

The random "I have no reason or rhyme for this read." is wolfy to a lot of people (maybe more) including me, but I know how you think, and it's not wolfy for you.

[DustinG]

[ QUOTE ]
The random "I have no reason or rhyme for this read." is wolfy to a lot of people (maybe more) including me, but I know how you think, and it's not wolfy for you.

[/ QUOTE ]

thats what I realized too late about Dmk

"Nich hasn't posted so he must be evil and I'm going to have perma-blinders on" seemed super wolfy to me, so wolfy he probably doesn't say it as a wolf.

[lastchance]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The random "I have no reason or rhyme for this read." is wolfy to a lot of people (maybe more) including me, but I know how you think, and it's not wolfy for you.

[/ QUOTE ]

thats what I realized too late about Dmk

"Nich hasn't posted so he must be evil and I'm going to have perma-blinders on" seemed super wolfy to me, so wolfy he probably doesn't say it as a wolf.

[/ QUOTE ]
Post more reasoning. And that's a bad read, yo. It's not that it's super-wolfy.

AWESOME EXPLANATION FORTHCOMING:
The real read behind using a player's logic to determine their role is not whether a player's logic and thought process is good, makes sense, or is intricate, but whether or not that player can come up with what he's saying and BELIEVES what he's saying.

This is what one needs to use to make reads, not whether a player's logic makes sense to you or is good.