|
|
#3481
11-16-2006, 06:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Malloreon: GAME THREAD and FINAL ROLE DESCRIPTIONS
[ QUOTE ]
now you will notice some people going after trufloridagator... i can't stress enough how ridiculous this is. he is a villager. i think the last evil (if in that group) is either tokyo, boiler or tabako. [/ QUOTE ] This post right here almost makes me want to scream for a Gator lynching. Boiler is confirmed, Tokyo most people find villagerly, and Xorbie is toth. So it makes my decision pretty clear. If tobako happens to be the last evil... good for him, he deserves it because we really have never even tried to think about killing him. 
|
|
#3482
11-16-2006, 06:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Malloreon: GAME THREAD and FINAL ROLE DESCRIPTIONS
[ QUOTE ]
xorbie, why tabako? [/ QUOTE ] well i first started to suspect him when he seemed to post less right after shorty died, so i thought he might be geran. obviously that isn't the case, but i guess some suspicion lingers. i always suspect more UTR people in general. his post today was pretty villagery though, so i'm certainly more inclined to go tokyo or boiler first if things come to that.
|
|
#3485
11-16-2006, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Malloreon: GAME THREAD and FINAL ROLE DESCRIPTIONS
[ QUOTE ]
patton, seriously. you have dmk listed in your "scary people" section along with soah, you have mornelth listed in your top suspect section with sighing and boiler. it's not exactly unheard of for evils/neutrals to list other evils. i remember that the part in the beggining was what made me really suspect you in the first place... as if toth would ever pass good information to durnitz at that stage (with evils getting owned). [/ QUOTE ] I love how you take a thought of mine that I even mentioned made no sense to me and try to use it against me (I specifically said it was an idea "that I would like to believe"... not that I know it is true).
|
|
#3486
11-16-2006, 06:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Malloreon: GAME THREAD and FINAL ROLE DESCRIPTIONS
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] there's almost no way we lynch him today either. [/ QUOTE ] Is MT really unlynchable today? [/ QUOTE ] no, i'm just saying if we believe very strongle he's cyradis it's a game theory mistake to lynch him.
|
|
#3487
11-16-2006, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Malloreon: GAME THREAD and FINAL ROLE DESCRIPTIONS
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] there's almost no way we lynch him today either. [/ QUOTE ] Is MT really unlynchable today? [/ QUOTE ] Tokyo laid out a pretty good argument earlier that made sense as to why MT pretty much has to be Cyr. I wish that wasn't the case, but it seems to be right.
|
|
#3490
11-16-2006, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Malloreon: GAME THREAD and FINAL ROLE DESCRIPTIONS
Villagerish posts by Tokyo IMO.
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] -If soah turns up evil (a distinct possibility by now), durron and you other people who flamed me (omg he's like 10% evil at most) when I suggested soah as an evil earlier can suck it. [/ QUOTE ] i never said that, i said "leaning villager but donno" [/ QUOTE ] LOL LIEAMENTS Durron said in response to me suggesting soah as evil: [ QUOTE ] nope. soah is like <30% wolf, tabako is <10%. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] however, soah is putting in like 20x more effort than anyone, including me, so if he is evil he deserves to win [/ QUOTE ] Yep you sure seemed confused here! It's all moot anyway if soah isn't evil, but it'd be awesome if he was. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] -If soah turns up evil (a distinct possibility by now), durron and you other people who flamed me (omg he's like 10% evil at most) when I suggested soah as an evil earlier can suck it. [/ QUOTE ] wow. WOW. this is a very bad miss of logic if you are evil. there is no reason to defend yourself in this. do people not realize that soah = evil -> pass the parsely? [/ QUOTE ] I don't get it? If soah is the last evil, we win. Uh, so? Then I can make fun of durron. What's wrong with that? [/ QUOTE ]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
