#311
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
And time for another meeting.
then I'll look for another wolf to pwn. |
#312
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
[ QUOTE ]
It's the height of idiocy to claim that soah is a good kill if he's seer and a bad kill if he's a villager. Unless you plan on saying that for EVERYONE. Because wolves don't know who the seer is. So they just kill someone, hoping. soah was probably killed for something he said. But he said a lot, so it's very difficult to tell which one thing the wolves keyed on. We're not going to figure it out, either, and assuming it was Dustin=wolf isn't going to get us in trouble if we're wrong. [/ QUOTE ] I said I wasn't going to talk about this anymore. But this is making me have to... Of course wolves don't KNOW who the seer is. But, on d1, you have your seer-hunt kills (potential seers) and your FPS kills (no shot in hell of being the seer, but useful in misleading the village). The in-between, or combo kills, are usually saved for d2, and d3. This is common practice for wolf teams. NOW, the fact that Zurv just agreed with you is unsettling considering that he spent like half of today talking about FPS kills and how d1 is never a seer hunt. Wolves don't know who the seer is. LDO. That has nothing to do with my point. If you guys don't understand what I'm saying, then I'm probably just arguing with wolves. |
#313
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
OH - you're making WAY TOO MANY assumptions about how the wolves operate in general. If Luckay is a wolf, soah could be a double treat kill for htem. He very well could have peeked Dustin (the assumption lots of people would make if he dies as seer or villager), OR it could be interpreted that he cleared luckay OR they decided to kill a good villager that had talked alot and was in little danger of being lynched.
You're just not stating your point at all clearly, since, after the entire day, I STILL do not know what you think of the night kill and what it means. |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
OK, fine. Soah's dead. Now what?
|
#315
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] but really, to expand: 1) I know I'm a villager (or seer). 2) Zurvan is pushing me like a LuckayLuck playing US Gamer Arcades. 3) Ergo, Zurvan is wrong (he's also wrong about me NOT seer hunting on night 1) 4) Ergo, Zurvan villager 5) Zurvan hates being wrong as a wolf, or at least, "very wrong" [/ QUOTE ] 1. I HATE HATE HATE being wrong.<-period 2. I'm really struggling to remember a game that you played where I was a wolf. I haven't been a wolf since ST2. That's a long time. And I was pretty wrong that game. [/ QUOTE ] EXACTLY, DOUCY you're not a wolf now if you're a wolf, you have PERFECT INFORMATION. Therefore, to be wrong, you would have to purposely be wrong, and you hate being wrong. Okay, I just gave away my big read on you, now I'm sad also, if I was a seer, of course I would peek you night zero zurvan. Easily. You freaking villager, you. I haven't given away my night one peek yet (if I had one, hyachachachachacha) |
#316
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
OH: AAAHHHH
Luckay: *SMACK* AAAAHHHH!!!!! AAAHHH!!!! !!! !! ! |
#317
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
y'know, if I had peeked soah yesterday night that would sure suck
|
#318
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
[ QUOTE ]
Okay, I just gave away my big read on you, now I'm sad [/ QUOTE ] Your read on me sucks, btw, fyi, qft, ldo |
#319
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
zurvan,
my name should be navruz |
#320
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NWO TAKEOVER — Game thread
how do we manage to get into arguments across two games on two different sites
and every single game in between pew...pew I'm a sad egg |
|
|