Halloween WW - Costume Party (Game Thread)

[jgunnip]

Monk,

go back and read my response to Mark the first time he posted his pumpkin theory. It should be obvious that I was responding with the knowledge of other pumpkin actions that he couldn't have known about.

Then he posts basically the same analysis of the situation and I felt that I could provide the necessary information that would prove his claim wrong and lead a village wagon on Mark. We need to get something going and we can always unvote if we don't like the way its going and reevaluate. Again, I'm sure people say this all the time but you will see that everything I have said is 100% true post game.

And seriously of all the roleclaims I could potentially fake claim why would I choose a NSGFP when there were already two confirmed nsgfp roles and another GFP in you?

[Bulletproof Monk]

im starting to entertain the idea of just having a mass pumpkin claim lol

[Bulletproof Monk]

[ QUOTE ]
Monk,

go back and read my response to Mark the first time he posted his pumpkin theory. It should be obvious that I was responding with the knowledge of other pumpkin actions that he couldn't have known about.

Then he posts basically the same analysis of the situation and I felt that I could provide the necessary information that would prove his claim wrong and lead a village wagon on Mark. We need to get something going and we can always unvote if we don't like the way its going and reevaluate. Again, I'm sure people say this all the time but you will see that everything I have said is 100% true post game.

And seriously of all the roleclaims I could potentially fake claim why would I choose a NSGFP when there were already two confirmed nsgfp roles and another GFP in you?

[/ QUOTE ]

the thing is, i want to believe you, but it doesnt matter now.

apprentice in every ww game ive ever played = no actions til the greater pumpkin/seer/whatever dies. til another nsgp pops up and tells me otherwise thats what i will believe.

[DustinG]

[Bulletproof Monk]

the fact that both fmxda and scott never mentioned night actions and both of them considered themselfs vanillagers doesnt exactly help your case either

[Bulletproof Monk]

btw, nsgp is exactly what i would claim here if i was a wofl

[jgunnip]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Monk,

go back and read my response to Mark the first time he posted his pumpkin theory. It should be obvious that I was responding with the knowledge of other pumpkin actions that he couldn't have known about.

Then he posts basically the same analysis of the situation and I felt that I could provide the necessary information that would prove his claim wrong and lead a village wagon on Mark. We need to get something going and we can always unvote if we don't like the way its going and reevaluate. Again, I'm sure people say this all the time but you will see that everything I have said is 100% true post game.

And seriously of all the roleclaims I could potentially fake claim why would I choose a NSGFP when there were already two confirmed nsgfp roles and another GFP in you?

[/ QUOTE ]

the thing is, i want to believe you, but it doesnt matter now.

apprentice in every ww game ive ever played = no actions til the greater pumpkin/seer/whatever dies. til another nsgp pops up and tells me otherwise thats what i will believe.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not claiming the the apprentice thing is wrong, I'm only stating what I know about my role and what's happened. I don't see how anybody could possibly think at this point I am not aligned with the village.

[jgunnip]

[ QUOTE ]
btw, nsgp is exactly what i would claim here if i was a wofl

[/ QUOTE ]

what does this have anything to do with anything?

[Mark_K]

I still think Monk is a scrambling wolf.

Doing some Jgunnip rereading... (and putting kids to bed)

[Bulletproof Monk]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
btw, nsgp is exactly what i would claim here if i was a wofl

[/ QUOTE ]

what does this have anything to do with anything?

[/ QUOTE ]

you said before 'why would i claim nsgp here when there are other roles i could claim'

im just saying that argument has no merit