Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating

[darom03]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how come nobody says "Great scott" anymore

[/ QUOTE ]

The term started in England after that Braveheart fellow caused all that trouble for them. The English looked down on the Scottish, the phrase originally was used when some one did something or said something that you did not expect them to capable of doing or saying, like who would have thought a bunch of ass backward Scots could give the English such a hard time. However, in modern times, the Scots find it to be derogatory and insulting so the phrase has lost its popularity as Scots have been known to give random beat downs when they hear it being used.

[/ QUOTE ]

And just when I thought this thread could deliver no more! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[aislephive]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't "spew" at all.

[/ QUOTE ]
PokerStars Game #10276698163: Hold'em No Limit ($2/$4) - 2007/06/04 - 23:14:39 (ET)
Table 'Notburga' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: FGators26 ($365.20 in chips)
Seat 2: Nikademus ($426.60 in chips)
Seat 4: STVBONN ($100 in chips)
Seat 5: greg1osu ($485.90 in chips)
Seat 6: only4dafam ($324.75 in chips)
Nikademus: posts small blind $2
STVBONN: posts big blind $4
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to FGators26 [Ad Ks]
greg1osu: calls $4
only4dafam: calls $4
FGators26: raises $24 to $28
Nikademus: raises $32 to $60
STVBONN: folds
greg1osu: folds
only4dafam: folds
FGators26: calls $32
*** FLOP *** [3c As 7s]
Nikademus: bets $70
FGators26: calls $70
*** TURN *** [3c As 7s] [8d]
CoupdOeil joins the table at seat #3
Nikademus: bets $120
FGators26: raises $115.20 to $235.20 and is all-in
Nikademus: calls $115.20
*** RIVER *** [3c As 7s 8d] [4d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Nikademus: shows [Ah Ac] (three of a kind, Aces)
FGators26: mucks hand
Nikademus collected $740.40 from pot

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah not hurting his case there buddy.

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
haha o/u on # of chromosomes mt2r has? ill set the line at 400.

[/ QUOTE ]

20...ldo

[Enervate]

[ QUOTE ]
Any claim that a poker site is rigged is so ridiculously absurd that I can't believe people actually take it seriously. Of course we all scream "[censored] rigged!!" when we lose AA to 62, but its not like we are statistically unbeatable.

And how would you go about proving rigged-ness? Giving a list of 500,000 bad beats? You all laugh at sample size when some posts a massively winning graph over 10K hands. 500,00 bad beats over what, 20 billion dealt hands in poker? 50 billion? I don't know what the total number is, but it is on that order. No sample set that you have is even remotely reasonable.

Secondly, why would a poker site rig? It has no incentive. You can create all the conspiracy theories you want, but it has no incentive. PokerStars will get users no matter what happens. Don't think you're so hot that they need to keep reeling you in, they don't give a [censored] about you.

As for stockman's post, wow. Keep spouting nonsense out of your ass. None of what you wrote makes any sense, and I dare you to try to prove any of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Finally, some intelligence.

[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
Ohhhh look at meeee, im kyleb, i totally like, know math and stuff.

[/ QUOTE ]
heeeeeey buddy

wow that was easy

[NozeCandy]

[ QUOTE ]
Fgators reminds me of a couple super-regulars on the FT $25nl tables.

[/ QUOTE ]
Umm, if they're super regulars at $25nl that's all you need to know to realize that they suck.