|
View Poll Results: FAVORITE ALL TIME | |||
Family Guy | 22 | 11.96% | |
Seinfeld | 34 | 18.48% | |
Fresh Prince | 7 | 3.80% | |
Friends | 5 | 2.72% | |
Everybody Loves Raymond | 2 | 1.09% | |
Who's the Boss | 3 | 1.63% | |
Sopranos | 17 | 9.24% | |
Entourage | 8 | 4.35% | |
Honeymooners | 5 | 2.72% | |
Baywatch | 2 | 1.09% | |
Growing Pains | 3 | 1.63% | |
South Park | 26 | 14.13% | |
King Of Queens | 2 | 1.09% | |
I love Lucy | 3 | 1.63% | |
Knight Rider | 2 | 1.09% | |
A-team | 3 | 1.63% | |
Beavis and Buthead | 12 | 6.52% | |
Married with Children | 13 | 7.07% | |
24 | 11 | 5.98% | |
Beverly Hills 90210 | 4 | 2.17% | |
Voters: 184. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#291
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
yo gild,
I guess you need to read this thread or something? definite beat right there |
#292
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
I think you might refrain from commenting for a bit, because you're not coming off very well.
In one post, you imply that anyone posting a picture of their daughter (etc, I'm assuming), can basically expect, well, it's not clear, but, "worse things than MSPaint her face in a Sklanksy man meat party." That's a pretty absurd assumption, which obvious doesn't hold. You then say that TF should have known "EXACTLY" what was going to happen. ?? Then you clearly didn't read or understand the original post, when you say, "How can you equate actual rape to MSPaint Sklansky banging?" And you end with the "If the same pictures had been censored, they would be fine? That makes no sense" zinger. I guess other people have already corrected you, but I just wanted to point out that you're not redeeming yourself or helping your case by, say, improving your comments. Hope this helps. |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
i didnt read the story line to the pics, i just saw them.
yeah, they were over the line but they were funny, and nothing worth banning over. the point i am trying to make is that THIS violation of 2p2 policy resulted in a banning and a deleted thread, and I see violations of 2p2 policy on OOT all the time, and they dont get deleted, and the OP rarely ever ends up getting banned. it's like BBV is under a microscope. also, the [censored] was funny. can we please have a new BBV forum where we all sign some consent form and promise not to sue 2p2 or something? like, a forum you have to have acccess to enter or something? it would be so much fun. |
#294
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
[ QUOTE ]
yo gild, I guess you need to read this thread or something? definite beat right there [/ QUOTE ] yea, unfortunately I spent about an hour of my life addressing people's concerns |
#295
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
i think you just got leveled gild.
also, point or no point? bbv is under the microscope, and most violations of 2p2 policy go unnoticed, and there have been a lot worse things posted/linked to that didnt result in bannings and deleted threads? point, right? |
#296
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
Tx,
I am sure that 2+2 won't do that, but anyone here can easily start their own anything-goes forum for BBV members if they want. |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
[ QUOTE ]
i think you just got leveled gild. also, point or no point? bbv is under the microscope, and most violations of 2p2 policy go unnoticed, and there have been a lot worse things posted/linked to that didnt result in bannings and deleted threads? point, right? [/ QUOTE ] if your point is that mod policy between forums is inconsistent, I'm not going to argue with you there |
#298
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
i would just like everyone to know that i think gildwulf had to do something. i think a one or two week ban was in order. but a perm ban is just retarded. ive never seen someone overreact to something like iron81 has in this thread. and, if it wouldnt anger the masses even more losing christina for awhile, i would have a free dan bright avatar too. those pictures were hilarious, if its such a huge problem, just delete the links. why is it always, HOLY [censored] MUST BAN, CANT TALK THINGS OUT WITH POSTER, [censored] NO, BAN BAN BAN. this is so lame.
rj |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
yeah but 2p2 wont host it.
|
#300
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Dan Bright banned
RJ,
Dan's been banned several times and knew he was getting banned for this post. Perm bans are obviously retarded for many reasons since the poster will just appear with a different name, but it's at least a symbolic show by the admins that they won't tolerate certain things. How many different names has KKF had on here? 5? 6? Doesn't matter - who cares. |
|
|