Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-17-2006, 01:19 PM
CrayZee CrayZee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forum Donkey
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: NYTimes article

[ QUOTE ]
The growth of the poker industry, meanwhile, has led some television executives to bet that darts, dominoes or blackjack will be next.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have an even better idea. Use dice to determine whether or not to play a single dart, dominoe, hand of blackjack or poker in 2.98 seconds. The caveat being that you must be a certified professional speed player at each game and under the influence of mushrooms. I call this show Super Gamble Dome Extreme IV!

How does one apply to become a TV exec? See you squares later! I'm headed to the top floor!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-17-2006, 02:19 PM
LionelHutz00 LionelHutz00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,662
Default Re: NYTimes article

next up on espn:


I'm bout to go from ashy to classy.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-17-2006, 09:30 PM
Municipal Hare Municipal Hare is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tone-
Posts: 404
Default Re: NYTimes article

[ QUOTE ]
I have an even better idea. Use dice to determine whether or not to play a single dart, dominoe, hand of blackjack or poker in 2.98 seconds. The caveat being that you must be a certified professional speed player at each game and under the influence of mushrooms. I call this show Super Gamble Dome Extreme IV!

How does one apply to become a TV exec? See you squares later! I'm headed to the top floor!

[/ QUOTE ]
Awesome.

"GET ME THE PRESIDENT OF TELEVISION!"
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-22-2006, 01:29 PM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: NYTimes article

I had a long talk to Tim O'Brien, the author. He wrote a gambling book, Bad Beat, which I have just bought but not read yet. It was a good talk, but it got edited down to one quote that makes me sound anti-tournament poker. Then Steve Lipscomb's response to me made it sound like I was complaining about my low World Poker Tour ranking. For the record, I'm not anti-tournament, although I don't play many, and I have no beef with the World Poker Tour.

To me, the key quote was "darts, dominoes and blackjack" will be next. That says the promoters think poker is doing well because lots of drunk guys do it, but a few sober people are really good (how'd they leave sex and arguing out of their list?). Or maybe it's "sports fat guys can win that aren't football or sumo."

I think poker is doing well because it's a great game. It's strength is its genuineness. The players risk their own money (for the most part), and didn't get in to the game to be celebrities. Almost all are really bad celebrities, too independent (that's a euphemism in some cases) and raw (another euphemism in some cases) to dance the E! dance. If you're tired of whiny soft millionaires pouting about who's best, or games run by and for rich slimeballs, poker is a refreshing alternative.

However, like golf, chess and tennis, it will never appeal much to people who don't play it. A major sport has car and insurance commercials, because people who never played will watch and care. The minor stuff has ads for equipment to play that sport.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.