is that a deal?

[shaniac]

seems like player A is obligated to whatever deal he offered, even though the terms were ridiculously vague, and, like NoahSD, I would not leave a conversation involving a deal dangling like that ever. I still don't get what "50 50 winner go to next stage" means, but I think Player A should honor it.

[Dunkman]

[ QUOTE ]

My current stake agreement has typed up "contract", aim convos, and spreadsheets tracking everything covered. I don't see how anyone could risk money without similar requirements (Except friendly prop bets + trading %, which I only do with people I trust as much as one can trust someone on the internet :P)

[/ QUOTE ]

total aside, but I'm starting to think I'm the only person here that isn't getting staked

[dudeoflife]

He said ok. Deal was made. Saying i don't have 2.5 k in my account just means he's going to have to figure a way of getting that money in.

[foxbat]

[ QUOTE ]

so is the deal on?


[/ QUOTE ]

Congrats on loading the post to get the answer you wanted.
You are expressing doubt in the losers mind. AFAIK the loser has never expressed any doubt that a deal was made, and right away contacted you to get the money. If the loser had any doubt I would agree no deal had been made. But it was YOU the Winner that doesn't seem sure so I think you should pay up.

[BrandiFan]

[ QUOTE ]
total aside, but I'm starting to think I'm the only person here that isn't getting staked

[/ QUOTE ]I also am not being staked. Not for lack of trying, I just suck... [/hijack]

[Jaysick88]

Sorry about this being off topic. (I am assuming this is Full Tilt Ironman Freeroll. )On Full Tilt if you agree to a deal in the chat box will Full Tilt enforce it or is it a gentleman's agreement where the "losing" party is just left to hope that the party who wins will transfer the money.

[BrandiFan]

is there supposed to be a question mark in there?