#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealer vs. Floor over a ruling
Dealer is right. More than half a bet can be raised, and in this instance, $50+$30=$80. Floor is a douche.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealer vs. Floor over a ruling
This is different everywhere.
In my game, since it wasn't a full bet, all anybody who had already acted could do is call. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealer vs. Floor over a ruling
when i played in that game regularly it was always a half bet to reopen...which floor was it?
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealer vs. Floor over a ruling
[ QUOTE ]
when i played in that game regularly it was always a half bet to reopen...which floor was it? [/ QUOTE ] Is it kosher to say his name? It was Sal. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealer vs. Floor over a ruling
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] when i played in that game regularly it was always a half bet to reopen...which floor was it? [/ QUOTE ] Is it kosher to say his name? It was Sal. [/ QUOTE ] Probably doesn't matter since you're not really ratting him out given few (if any) in LA Cardroom management read this forum. ~ Rick |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dealer vs. Floor over a ruling
[ QUOTE ]
This isn't a rule that should vary by cardroom, right? [/ QUOTE ] Apparently it does. In San Jose, the only thing the players who checked could do would be to call the $30. They cannot make it $80 or $50. |
|
|