Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > High Stakes MTT
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-06-2007, 01:26 PM
Double Ice Double Ice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 433
Default Re: Hypothetical Rebuy Tournament

Mr Weak Tight is obviously wrong about people not rebuying intially. His other arguments are solid arguments, and he is not getting credit for them.

Lets talk about his argument, which is an appeal to chip equity. In the beginning, you have 2 buyins, and a double-buyin is free. Obviously the correct play is to shove because you can't lose anything. Notice that here, the 2 buyin "compensation" for losing is your whole stack. When you have more chips, say 20 buyins, the effect is not as pronounced. Say everyone on the table has 20 buyins. If someone loses an all in, they only get compensated 2 buyins, which is 1/10th a stack. If players are push/folding optimally, then in terms of chip equity, it is not correct to shove/call shoves with every hand, because some really weak hands don't do well enough even versus a random hand, among other considerations. So it is true that relatively early (not "one million chips" as someone mentioned, but closer to 10 or so buyins) players, if all playing optimally (Nash eq.) should be tightening up, if they wanted to make only +cev moves. [Obviously if everyone knew for sure that everyone else was shoving blind no matter what, then it is "optimal" to shove every hand no matter what number of chips.]

There is one interesting thing to note in these arguments.
We usually have a general idea in our head that 200,000 chips now is worth the same amount as 200,000 chips later. In fact, the chips decrease in value for obvious reasons. This makes "sitting" on chips worth less, because as time passes, the chips are depreciating in value. Obviously in the early stages of an MTT, chip value is linear (that is, twice as many chips is twice the equity), so that is an argument for not taking -cev spots in a vacuum.

Anyways, because of these considerations, the situation is more complex, and certain moves that are -cev in a vaccum, might be good (knocking players out so they will rebuy-shove more, allowing you +cev spots because you can select a tighter range, while they have no choice but to shove any cards)

In conclusion it is really hard to say what exactly optimal play in maniac rebuys is, and it really depends on the players.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.