Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-05-2007, 03:35 PM
coberst coberst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 308
Default Re: The decider is the ego

It seems to be a bit like that side of cognitive science that believes in symbol manipulation, i.e AI.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-05-2007, 03:41 PM
coberst coberst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 308
Default Re: The decider is the ego

When I speak of a domain of knowledge I am speaking about serious knowledge and not general fantasy. And when I study a new domain of knowledge I try to exercise due diligence in the form of choosing a reputable guide in the form of a great thinker in that domain of knowledge. I do not study those things you ask about. I think your claims against Freud cause me to question your judgment or perhaps it is just that you speak of matters about which you are ignorant.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-05-2007, 03:49 PM
tame_deuces tame_deuces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,494
Default Re: The decider is the ego

Take it from me, Freud has a very, very low star in academic psychology circles. Basically the theories are circular logic through and through, and the majority of his writings are based on a _single_ case study of what was most likely an individual with brain lesions and perhaps drug addictions, the infamous Anna O.

If this was done physics it would be the equivalent of watching someone throw a baseball upwards and theorizing baseballs don't adhere to the laws of gravity, hence the laws of gravity don't apply on spherical objects.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-05-2007, 04:39 PM
luckyme luckyme is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,778
Default Re: The decider is the ego

[ QUOTE ]
I try to exercise due diligence in the form of choosing a reputable guide in the form of a great thinker in that domain of knowledge.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just one? And how do you have that much confidence in your knowledge of the topic ( in which you are a neophyte ) to recognize great thinkers.
You have on this forum, posters with knowledge of the fields, perhaps they, or people like them, should be your guide to the guide you are looking for, rather than whatever method you've been using ... they haven't served you well so far. You've been wasting valuable investigative time on dead ends.

luckyme
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-06-2007, 07:16 AM
coberst coberst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 308
Default Re: The decider is the ego

[ QUOTE ]
Take it from me, Freud has a very, very low star in academic psychology circles. Basically the theories are circular logic through and through, and the majority of his writings are based on a _single_ case study of what was most likely an individual with brain lesions and perhaps drug addictions, the infamous Anna O.

If this was done physics it would be the equivalent of watching someone throw a baseball upwards and theorizing baseballs don't adhere to the laws of gravity, hence the laws of gravity don't apply on spherical objects.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why should I "take it from me" as you ask? I have been taking it from recognized specialists before and I am not inclined to take it from just anyone. I constantly get loads of sophomoric bluff and bluster.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-06-2007, 07:18 AM
coberst coberst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 308
Default Re: The decider is the ego

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I try to exercise due diligence in the form of choosing a reputable guide in the form of a great thinker in that domain of knowledge.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just one? And how do you have that much confidence in your knowledge of the topic ( in which you are a neophyte ) to recognize great thinkers.
You have on this forum, posters with knowledge of the fields, perhaps they, or people like them, should be your guide to the guide you are looking for, rather than whatever method you've been using ... they haven't served you well so far. You've been wasting valuable investigative time on dead ends.

luckyme

[/ QUOTE ]

Those of us who constantly explore new domains of knowledge quickly learn how to separate the bluff and bluster from the real thing.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-06-2007, 08:05 AM
MidGe MidGe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Shame on you, Blackwater!
Posts: 3,908
Default Re: The decider is the ego

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I try to exercise due diligence in the form of choosing a reputable guide in the form of a great thinker in that domain of knowledge.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just one? And how do you have that much confidence in your knowledge of the topic ( in which you are a neophyte ) to recognize great thinkers.
You have on this forum, posters with knowledge of the fields, perhaps they, or people like them, should be your guide to the guide you are looking for, rather than whatever method you've been using ... they haven't served you well so far. You've been wasting valuable investigative time on dead ends.

luckyme

[/ QUOTE ]

Those of us who constantly explore new domains of knowledge quickly learn how to separate the bluff and bluster from the real thing.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wish it was so, coberst, but you are definitely not a good example, or manifestation, of that!

On the other hand those constantly exploring new domains of knowledge may too quickly think they learn how to separate the bluff and bluster from the real thing.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-06-2007, 08:18 AM
tame_deuces tame_deuces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,494
Default Re: The decider is the ego

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Take it from me, Freud has a very, very low star in academic psychology circles. Basically the theories are circular logic through and through, and the majority of his writings are based on a _single_ case study of what was most likely an individual with brain lesions and perhaps drug addictions, the infamous Anna O.

If this was done physics it would be the equivalent of watching someone throw a baseball upwards and theorizing baseballs don't adhere to the laws of gravity, hence the laws of gravity don't apply on spherical objects.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why should I "take it from me" as you ask? I have been taking it from recognized specialists before and I am not inclined to take it from just anyone. I constantly get loads of sophomoric bluff and bluster.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well what opinions/statements I offered are researchable, and the logic of freud's works you can examine for yourself.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.