Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-31-2007, 10:57 PM
Thug Bubbles Thug Bubbles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 452
Default Re: The Military and Armed Conflict

Any ACists comment? Do you all feel like Nielsio?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-31-2007, 11:18 PM
Richard Tanner Richard Tanner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now this is a movement I can sink my teeth into
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: The Military and Armed Conflict

[ QUOTE ]
Humans believe in universal morality. It's in their genes . It's undeniable. If at any time you hurt someone else, your own humanity suffers, and with it your capacity to be happy and to have natural emotions of joy.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont' think those words mean what you think they mean.

[ QUOTE ]
They are bamboozled and sad victims of the meatgrinding state/ruling class.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who is this ruling class you always speak of, and who are the millions they oppress.

[ QUOTE ]
Death star objection?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok one of us doesn't know what those words mean. I always thought the DSO referenced the idea that it's not fair to say a system would fail to protect us from something the current system (or any other it's being compared to) because neither can prevent special situations like that.

Then later it would be misapplied many times when used to describe things that are prevented under statism.

What does "conflict being inevitable" have to do with the DSO.

Cody
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-31-2007, 11:43 PM
Phil153 Phil153 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,905
Default Re: The Military and Armed Conflict

[ QUOTE ]
1. What do you think of people who join the military, and why?

[/ QUOTE ]
The ideals are fine, the reality is somewhat different.

[ QUOTE ]
2. Do you think armed conflict is sometimes unavoidable?

[/ QUOTE ]
Absolutely. If only for diplomacy - the readiness to go to war stays a lot of hands IMO, and demonstrating this means sometimes actually going to war. Certain nations may have thought twice had the US not been so isolationist in 30s/40s.

[ QUOTE ]
3. What avenues can one take if they wish to help in an armed conflict on a soldiering level?

[/ QUOTE ]
None except for the military.

[ QUOTE ]
5. What do you think of private security forces? (emphasis on "forces" and not a department store security guard)

[/ QUOTE ]
A dangerous idea. Legitimizing the use of force to private interests, whose first motivation is profit, seems unwise to me. It works ok in one's own country, as they're restrained by custom, but in a war torn country it seems like a recipe for abuse.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.