#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He put me on quads...
i dont get the title of this thread... if he put you on quads he still should've raised... he should've raised no matter what, we do that with the nuts i believe??? its right to raise with the best possible hand on the river... right? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
whoever this is should be shot and never allowed to have a str8 flush again! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He put me on quads...
[ QUOTE ]
i dont get the title of this thread... if he put you on quads he still should've raised... he should've raised no matter what, we do that with the nuts i believe??? its right to raise with the best possible hand on the river... right? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] whoever this is should be shot and never allowed to have a str8 flush again! [/ QUOTE ] After reading your post I went into a deeper analysis of the hand and after counting all two hole cards matched with the board, shockingly, it turns out no hand can beat any hand that contains the 7 of diamonds. For instance if you held jack of diamonds and ten of diamonds you would have jack of diamonds ten of diamonds 9 of diamonds 8 of diamonds NOTHING!! |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He put me on quads...
[ QUOTE ]
if you held jack of diamonds and ten of diamonds you would have jack of diamonds ten of diamonds 9 of diamonds 8 of diamonds NOTHING!! [/ QUOTE ] Actually, I think that would be a Ted Lawson Straight Flush. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He put me on quads...
He put you on quints.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He put me on quads...
[ QUOTE ]
He put you on quints. [/ QUOTE ] im thinking octets |
|
|