Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-16-2007, 12:29 PM
icheckcallu icheckcallu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Losing play money
Posts: 274
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

[ QUOTE ]
Villians are 24/19 (button) 18/16 (sb)

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $62.65
Hero (BB): $50.50
UTG: $67.15
CO: $87.85
BTN: $214.15

Preflop: Hero is dealt 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (5 Players)
2 folds, <font color="red">BTN raises to $2.00</font>, SB calls $1.75, <font color="red">Hero raises to $8.00</font>, BTN calls $6.00, SB calls $6.00

Flop: ($24) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 Players)

SB Checks, Hero?

[/ QUOTE ]
raise more pf.... 11ish is good... as played u gotta c bet here
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-16-2007, 12:43 PM
lsaw2 lsaw2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NL 6Max
Posts: 399
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

Having raised this preflop as a squeeze you obv have AK so close your eyes c-bet ~ 18 if you've been playing tight; if you've been playing LAG or they have been looking you up with btm pair then just c/f.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-16-2007, 12:45 PM
sightless sightless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 9,009
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

I cbet
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-16-2007, 12:59 PM
choccypie choccypie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Leeds, England
Posts: 598
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

If you want to steal this, cbet the flop, but fold to a raise or a shove. You beat nothing except another bluff with a worse hand...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-16-2007, 01:35 PM
Greco Greco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

if you're on a steal you have to raise more.in fact if i've got a hand i re raise more anyway. Like to $11. have to raise more OOP and from the blinds to cut down the odds and to discourage people callin in pos with good implied odds.
as played you have to bet this flop. You have AK right? Bet it and fold to resistance.Its pointless making this play and not betting flop.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-16-2007, 01:41 PM
bozzer bozzer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: in with the 2p2 lingo
Posts: 2,140
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

anyone prefer calling preflop to squeezing? if you think calling isn't profitable it looks like a good spot to squeeze tho.

i don't cbet here.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-16-2007, 03:06 PM
AZplaya AZplaya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: pwning NL $50
Posts: 1,992
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

I think this is a perfect spot to squeeze but after both Villians call I'm pretty much done with the hand unless I flop big...and you definitly didn't flop big.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-16-2007, 03:21 PM
monkeymaps monkeymaps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: davol patrick, sucks
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

[ QUOTE ]
anyone prefer calling preflop to squeezing? if you think calling isn't profitable it looks like a good spot to squeeze tho.

i don't cbet here.

[/ QUOTE ]

meh I dont love SC oop but you prob play them better than me so call might be ok.

those saying fold pre must realize that this play is going to work alot esp since villans stats indicate they have some clue how to play which makes this move even better.
hell I even do this at 10NL against the right villans.

as played I have a hard time not c-beting this could be spew but given your line I think players have a hard time calling without a strong ace.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-16-2007, 03:24 PM
Mike Kelley Mike Kelley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Reraising
Posts: 2,126
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

+1 vote for betting your AK [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

$15-$18

Standard play.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-16-2007, 04:27 PM
Kasane Kasane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 906
Default Re: NL 50 Squeeze PF cbet or not?

With both villains calling, the chances are very high that one of them has an A -- especially since we don't have any! Stats on both players argue for one of them having AK/AQ. Maybe, just maybe they both have mid-high pairs that they'll fold to a cbet -- but experience has told me that cutting your losses is cheaper here than a cbet.

HU -- cbet is rational. And usually this squeeze will result in at most one caller, if any.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.