Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Would you?
Yes 68 94.44%
No 4 5.56%
Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-12-2007, 04:58 PM
traz traz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sleeping on stacks
Posts: 19,775
Default Re: Interesting logic question

I can see it being either one. Instinctively I thought #1, and I think that's far more intuitive.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-12-2007, 05:00 PM
felson felson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,177
Default Re: Interesting logic question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if i were taking a logic test, i would say #2. if i came across this sentence in a medical guide, obv i would assume that the author meant to write the opposite.

[/ QUOTE ]

I could care less what you assume the author meant to write.

[/ QUOTE ]

nh
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-12-2007, 05:04 PM
kinda kinda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: $600 banana suit COME ON
Posts: 324
Default Re: Interesting logic question

#1 obv
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-12-2007, 05:04 PM
Arito Arito is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 931
Default Re: Interesting logic question

[ QUOTE ]
it took me so long to figure out how the hell people were answering #2. but now i get it!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah same here, it's like one of those "I see a vase! / I see two faces!" thing.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-12-2007, 05:09 PM
felson felson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,177
Default Re: Interesting logic question

the double negative in the OP produces a literal meaning that makes no sense, so we naturally convert it to a single negative.

"i can't get no satisfaction." -->
"i can't get any satisfaction" vs "i am forced to get some satisfaction"
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-12-2007, 05:35 PM
VickreyAuction VickreyAuction is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 2,162
Default Re: Interesting logic question

no head injury is too small to ignore --->
all head injuries are too big to ignore

that's how I interpreted it.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-12-2007, 05:57 PM
DcifrThs DcifrThs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Spewin them chips
Posts: 10,115
Default Re: Interesting logic question

[ QUOTE ]
i'm glad we're getting a dispersion of beliefs here.

i'll weigh in later on tonight or tomorrow on both threads... as well as the results from the two posts and why i made them.

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

well i think the results have levelled off enough to reveal the issue.

i was having dinner with my dad when his friend asked me this question and i thought about it for a sec and immediately answered "of course, treat all head injuries." he then asked "really?? are you SURE?" and i though tabout it and rephrased the question to get at the answer. my instinct to guess "treat'em all" is interesting and thought many would share it.

the issue can be clearly seen by an analogous statement:

"no gun is too small to be banned."

therefore, you should ban all guns!

No X is too small to be Y'd implies that you should Y all Xs.

this phrase comes from Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll.

Alice hits her head and the queen of hearts tells her not to worry about it. alice says the injury is small and the queen then says "no head injury is too small to be ignored."

it is interesting b/c if i posted "No gun is too small to be banned" everybody would say, "sure, you should ban all guns"

but because the brain seems to want to protect itself, it a priori thinks that all head injuries shoudl be treated and thus concludes that no head injury is too small to be ignored means that you should treat them all...

at least thats how i think about it.

i was further curious to see whether more mathematically oriented people would get the syntax more easily than average people, thus SMP vs. OOT.

in fact, it came out that way and SMP (though fewer responses) was close to evenly split whereas OOT was dramatically tilted towards the incorrect answer of treating all head injuries.

thanks for all the input guys,
Barron
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-12-2007, 05:59 PM
sebbb sebbb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 970
Default Re: Interesting logic question

"no head injury is too small to ignore"

Let x be the size of the headache.

Let f(x)=1 if we don't ignore the headache
f(x)=0 if we do

I'm gonna suppose that there exists a specific headache size s such that:

if x>=s f(x)=1
if x<s f(x)=0



The opposite of "no head injury is too small to ignore" (A) is "there exists a head injury of size 'a' that is too small to ignore" (not A)


not-A implies that any head injury of size x<a shouldn't be ignored (since they are even smaller, so they are also too small to ignore). So we don't ignore any headache (since headaches of size >a aren't ignored either).

Also "we don't ignore any headache" => not A

So (not A)<=>"we don't ignore any headache"

A is the opposite of "we don't ignore any headache"


Conclusion:

"no head injury is too small to ignore" is the opposite of "treat all head injuries". But it doesnt mean "ignore all head injuries". It just means that there are some injuries that we treat, others that we don't.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-12-2007, 05:59 PM
mason55 mason55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: televisiphonernetting
Posts: 10,530
Default Re: Interesting logic question

p = a head injury
q = a size that can be ignored

there are no P that are not Q

which means all P are Q
which means "all head injuries are of a size that can be ignored"

ignore all head injuries

QED
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-12-2007, 06:00 PM
bawcerelli bawcerelli is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 953
Default Re: Interesting logic question

i'm not buying it
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.