#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
I can always rebuy :P
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
So this range is 40% combos overpair under a T, 20% combos worse ace high, 20% combos flush draw, 20% combos ace with pair:
Hand 0: 57.622% 53.31% 04.31% 6861 555.00 { 88, A9s, A4s, KsQs, 9s8s } Hand 1: 42.378% 38.07% 04.31% 4899 555.00 { AhTc } Hand 0: 54.106% 49.96% 04.15% 6430 533.50 { 88, A9s, A4s, KsQs, 9s8s } Hand 1: 45.894% 41.75% 04.15% 5373 533.50 { AhJs } |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
[ QUOTE ]
You do realize Raze that if he turns KsQs face up and pushes I call right? [/ QUOTE ] Yea, that's cool, but we're talking about his whole range here right? I don't have Pokerstove or the desire to bust out a calculator at the moment, but KQss in particular would probably be about a neutral call for you, and I mentioned above that I feel his range is going to be weighted towards better hands than KQss. [ QUOTE ] Obviously this is not my standard play in this situation. And maybe it's a negative EV play, and that's why I came to you guys, but just dismissing it as WTF FISH AT OMGFOADSUF is pretty shortsighted. [/ QUOTE ] If you mean me, you better relax because I gave you a pretty thoughtful and respectful reply, and I don't think anyone here called you a fish. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
i'd say the onus is on you to provide a reasonable range of hands for him against which you can profitably call
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
I'd give a little higher % to fd, naked 6, or 6 with a pair, and also alot something for complete air, but yeah, something like that.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
[ QUOTE ]
i'd say the onus is on you to provide a reasonable range of hands for him against which you can profitably call [/ QUOTE ] I like that idea |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
Read thread, I did that.
Oh, here... A9,A8,A7,A6,A6s,A7s,A8s,A9s,7s8s,9s8s,JsTs,QsJs,Qs Ks,KsJs,QsTs,Qs9s,Ks9s,KsTs,Js9s,Js8s,Qs8s,77,88,9 9, +random 6 draws, other spade draws, complete air. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
Best case scenario: He has Air. Too bad YOU HAVE AIR TOO.
This is HUGELY -ev. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
this is so gross.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +/- EV of this call?
[ QUOTE ]
Read thread, I did that. Oh, here... A9,A8,A7,A6,A6s,A7s,A8s,A9s,7s8s,9s8s,JsTs,QsJs,Qs Ks,KsJs,QsTs,Qs9s,Ks9s,KsTs,Js9s,Js8s,Qs8s,77,88,9 9, +random 6 draws, other spade draws, complete air. [/ QUOTE ] He probably plays any made hand like this on the flop (at least I would.) I would play TT-AA, any set, any two pair like this (and I'd probably call u 3-bet monkeys w/ [censored] like 43s in position.) |
|
|