Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:03 PM
RonWR RonWR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Israel
Posts: 143
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

FT and other sites making this type of promotion use a insurance company , they don't pay out the entire 10M themselves
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:05 PM
Zetack Zetack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,043
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

[ QUOTE ]
FT and other sites making this type of promotion use a insurance company , they don't pay out the entire 10M themselves

[/ QUOTE ]

That's ordinarily true when the payout is a cash prize. I wonder if its true where the payout is actually an endorsement contract including personal services.

--Zetack
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:05 PM
Sponger. Sponger. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 19,136
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

[ QUOTE ]
FT and other sites making this type of promotion use a insurance company , they don't pay out the entire 10M themselves

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think you understand what is going on.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:11 PM
Zetack Zetack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,043
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

[ QUOTE ]
i wonder if they pay for travel to these offline promotional events

would suck to have to fly all over the world on your dime, even if you're making 1 mil/year

[/ QUOTE ]

It almost certainly is not the case that he would have to travel on his own dime, although again that's usually something that would be spelled out.

But there is a huge difference between, say, 20 personal appearances of a meet & greet nature lasting 1-3 hours, and say, 52 all day appearances where you're expected to sign 600 promotional items and make an appearance in a dunking tank.

Ok, I'm joking about the dunking tank, but if Full-Tilt wants to weasel out of the contract, they could make the requirements pretty unpalattable. Not that they necessarily will of course, its just pretty broad language they have to work with. Somebody else would have to comment on whether there's an implied covenant of reasonableness and where the line on reasonableness might fall.

I would presume that a full contract would be signed and all of these things fully spelled out, by the by. I also expect that if there is a qualifying winner that he won't have a lot of bargaining power on the terms, other than, perhaps, signing up with poker stars for some much smaller amount of money.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:24 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Intrepidly Reporting
Posts: 14,174
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder if it's really worth $10 Mil? Say someone like Robert Varkonyi had a deal like this back in 2002 - it's doubtful that today (5 years after his ME win) he still has enough juice to be worth $1M/year to a site.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is actually a tricky question that I thought about a little before entering via FTP, since I have certain stock holdings that might be at issue here.

someone like Varkonyi would be very well served by a 10 year deal because he's simply not worth a million a year in endorsements. someone like Phil Ivey, pretending he won, might wind up losing a ton of money on the deal - he is very likely worth > 1m/year if he is properly marketed. OTOH, Moneymaker/Raymer/Hachem definitely aren't getting a million a year from outside deals, either (although in Greg's case, never finishing his book has something to do with that [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] )

so for the vast majority of people, the contract is far more than they'd earn any other way. for a few pros, this might be a bad deal. as for the site itself, the offers are essentially frontloaded - having that year's winner (unless he's Jamie Gold) is likely worth a ton in exposure and might pay for the cost of a 10 year annuity in year 1. everything after that is gravy.

also, if rainkhan wins, stars will go bananas over him.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:30 PM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

I'm not actually sure Watkinson is worth $1mm to Tilt. they already have a huge stable of famous pro's...adding 1 more doesn't have the incremental value that adding Watkinson to a medium sized room would have.

I dunno, maybe he's worth $1mm to Tilt, but worth more to others, and with the state of online poker in the US, a middle aged white guy from America may have trouble getting a sponsorship from some places.

so if he wins, it's probably a win/win.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:35 PM
samsdmf samsdmf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: N, Wales UK
Posts: 1,881
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i wonder if they pay for travel to these offline promotional events

would suck to have to fly all over the world on your dime, even if you're making 1 mil/year

[/ QUOTE ]

It almost certainly is not the case that he would have to travel on his own dime, although again that's usually something that would be spelled out.

But there is a huge difference between, say, 20 personal appearances of a meet & greet nature lasting 1-3 hours, and say, 52 all day appearances where you're expected to sign 600 promotional items and make an appearance in a dunking tank.

Ok, I'm joking about the dunking tank, but if Full-Tilt wants to weasel out of the contract, they could make the requirements pretty unpalattable. Not that they necessarily will of course, its just pretty broad language they have to work with. Somebody else would have to comment on whether there's an implied covenant of reasonableness and where the line on reasonableness might fall.

I would presume that a full contract would be signed and all of these things fully spelled out, by the by. I also expect that if there is a qualifying winner that he won't have a lot of bargaining power on the terms, other than, perhaps, signing up with poker stars for some much smaller amount of money.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty sure the conditions are on the site and were posted in BBV a month or so back (good2cu started the thread I think)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:37 PM
SenatorKevin SenatorKevin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shampoo is better!
Posts: 283
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

[ QUOTE ]
I just heard from a media source that Lee Watkinson is a Full Tilt Poker Qualifier and is playing for an extra $10,000,000 is he wins tomorrow.

Matt Savage

[/ QUOTE ]

Full Tilt also pays you extra just for making the final table as a qualifer. I saw the bonus schedule somewhere.. maybe someone has already posted it.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:41 PM
Maple Leafs Maple Leafs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 663
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

There's nothing binding here for FTP qualifiers, is there? If Watkinson wins he can always negotiate something else on his own if he chooses, or is he tied into this automatically once he qualifies through FTP?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:43 PM
BigAlK BigAlK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 874
Default Re: Lee Watkinson + FT Qualifier + Winner = $18,250,000

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not actually sure Watkinson is worth $1mm to Tilt. they already have a huge stable of famous pro's...adding 1 more doesn't have the incremental value that adding Watkinson to a medium sized room would have.

[/ QUOTE ]

The interesting thing here is that Watkinson is already part of FT's stable of "famous" pros (along with such notables as Shannon Elizabeth, Ali Nejad, and Marco Traniello). They divide them into 3 tiers ("Team Full Tilt"/"The Hendon Mob", "Full Tilt Pros", and "Friends of Full Tilt"). Watkinson is in the 2nd tier, maybe this would move him up into the 1st tier, don't know.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.