![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
switch all of the tourneys to turbo's and I can guarantee a FT
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I'm in favor of reducing time for $200 buyin events because they will get 2k+ runners, causing them to run for 15+ hours with 30 minute levels. Am I the only one who thinks we could do away with the 10/20 level? No reason IMO to play 150bb deep for 1/2 hour, 100bb is plenty deep to start out. [/ QUOTE ] I would rather have a great structured tournament that runs for 15 hrs than something that lasts for 12 and gets crapshooty towards the mid to late stages. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More evidence that PLO is short stacked in the WCOOP relative to NLHE: the $500+30 events.
PLO starting stack = 3000, a level 13 orbit = 2250, ratio = 1.33 NLHE starting stack = 10000, a level 13 orbit = 6000, ratio = 1.67 And remember, PLO plays much faster than NLHE when the stacks are equally deep. I think you should treat the $500+30 PLO as your premium PLO tourney of the year. Instead, it's set up like it's a sideshow for NLHE. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
More evidence that PLO is short stacked in the WCOOP relative to NLHE: the $500+30 events. PLO starting stack = 3000, a level 13 orbit = 2250, ratio = 1.33 NLHE starting stack = 10000, a level 13 orbit = 6000, ratio = 1.67 And remember, PLO plays much faster than NLHE when the stacks are equally deep. I think you should treat the $500+30 PLO as your premium PLO tourney of the year. Instead, it's set up like it's a sideshow for NLHE. [/ QUOTE ] No offense, but I think we get the point already. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't worry, I'm done. I just want to make sure my argument gets seen by Bryan.
I really don't want the PLO events scaled back to 20 minute levels because several people want some of the NLHE events sped up. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No worries, Silent... I've seen them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Your posts have spurned me into researching reports to compare NLHE speed to PLO speed, given equal stacks and field sizes. It'll take a while to collect a good sample... lots of tournaments to scan through. All the best, Bryan S. Tournaments Administrator PokerStars Poker Room Management Team |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could you please add a 20k winner take all event? 2nd gets their money back, first gets Isabella Mercier!!
i [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] her |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I may speak for everyone who loves PLO, "thank you, very, very much."
And if I may speak for everyone who is sick of me polluting this thread with PLO, "thank you, very, very much." [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you run information on the satellites? Maybe we can post some ideas on those structures with slightly higher buyins with a better ratio for winners to each event. (i/e 1 in 4 or 5 like the FTOPS)
Also, how about a 100r for the main event satellite? Or a 3 stage like the Sunday Million like a $15 to a $100, then the $100 to a $500 with almost 1 in 5 getting a seat to the ME. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want 3-4 stage sats personally :P. They increase runners, increase "got in on a sat for 10 bucks and won 230k!!!!" marketing, and of course I can exploit large soft fields for low-variance profit!
|
![]() |
|
|