#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
ultimate bet did the same to many players a few months back. i was one of them.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
that sucks, but its not surprising....I mean it is party poker
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
[ QUOTE ]
Sucks if it's true, but to be honest the OP reeks of bullshite. Maybe it's just me tho. [/ QUOTE ] Why? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
I don't believe anyone could 8 table for 8 hours on regular basis. Sure once in a while for ROSTUCKO or on aderall or whatever, but not regularly.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
i dont believe people can have sex as much as some say they do...........lol.
we all aint the same same! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
Looks to me like jetsetboy wanted to get rakeback on Party so he opened an account in his girlfriends name. And got busted.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
[ QUOTE ]
For some, this isn’t much, but hey, it was supposed to pay the rent for the next 6 months! [/ QUOTE ] NEVER play with your rent money! |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
The Zoo: Where Logic Goes to Die
[ QUOTE ] Looks to me like jetsetboy wanted to get rakeback on Party so he opened an account in his girlfriends name. And got busted. [/ QUOTE ] There is no evidence to support this. [ QUOTE ] I don't believe anyone could 8 table for 8 hours on regular basis. Sure once in a while for ROSTUCKO or on aderall or whatever, but not regularly. [/ QUOTE ] And you know this because you're an expert on human attention spans? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
[ QUOTE ]
The Zoo: Where Logic Goes to Die [ QUOTE ] Looks to me like jetsetboy wanted to get rakeback on Party so he opened an account in his girlfriends name. And got busted. [/ QUOTE ] There is no evidence to support this. [/ QUOTE ] Occam's Razor, my friend. Do you really believe his girlfriend watched him win money, started her account and was playing 8 tables for 8 hours a day instantly? Give me a break. Anyway, there's no evidence even proving that jetsetboy/girl even had an account on Party, money on Party, that there account was frozen, etc. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Regular Party players: you had better read this
[ QUOTE ]
Occam's Razor, my friend. [/ QUOTE ] It never ceases to amaze me how muppets can use a rarely understood phrase like "Occam's Razor" and think that it removes their logical holes. If you were to correctly use the principle, you would assume that the OP is telling the truth - because that is the simplest explanation. Creating hypothetical rakeback accounts, with no evidence to support them (even though it is certainly a possibility), on the basis of a woman playing high-volume online poker is the precise opposite of Occam's Razor. People who don't know how to apply logical concepts should not randomly quote them. [ QUOTE ] Do you really believe his girlfriend watched him win money, started her account and was playing 8 tables for 8 hours a day instantly? Give me a break. [/ QUOTE ] You are creating further information here in your assumptions. The OP said that after "several months" of play, she "began to play sometimes for 8 hours." That is a long way from "playing 8 tables for 8 hours a day instantly." It is not absurd to think that 200NL is beatable after around six months of play. Not everyone has the same limitations as you. [ QUOTE ] Anyway, there's no evidence even proving that jetsetboy/girl even had an account on Party, money on Party, that there account was frozen, etc. [/ QUOTE ] This is also untrue. The OP's post is evidence of that - certainly not conclusive proof, but it is certainly evidence. If you think there is no evidence that OP even had an account, I'm willing to make an even money wager with you on the issue. $100? |
|
|