Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-27-2007, 10:54 AM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

This is a supertough spot and I do feel utg has AJ.

On the other hand you are getting good odds and he played it so retardedly that utg could also have AK. I think you can justify a call.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-27-2007, 10:55 AM
fees fees is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Whats my motivation? LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Posts: 4,162
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

this is an insta fold, one of them has aces full or JJ, let it go and confirm success, you get a free peek remember=D
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-27-2007, 10:55 AM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

[ QUOTE ]
Another thing to consider is the CO calling. I would be more tempted to call UTG's push without the CO calling because how many times does the CO call with less than AJ/A8/A7/JJ in that spot?

[/ QUOTE ]

CO is calling with any ace. Given his preflop play he can have AQ/AK. And the river completed a straight as well.

But you are right, all of this is very thin.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-27-2007, 10:56 AM
johnnyrocket johnnyrocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 8 tabling and raising all donk bets
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think I can fold this vs. 2 donkeys...

[/ QUOTE ]

i agree, UTG is passive but i think his stats show he isnt real good and will push here with trip aces, CO means nothing to me cuz he is a calling machine. i think i call this but it is very close, i think the stats pushed me to a call.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-27-2007, 10:56 AM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Trying to be the shepherd
Posts: 18,437
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

With a 63/1 player in the mix, I have a hard time folding. This could be AK and AQ. UTG has should uber strength, but does he really limp AJ with a 63/1 donkey at the table? A7 or A8 are the hands I am afraid of.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-27-2007, 11:06 AM
redCashion redCashion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bill Fillmaff Protege
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

I agree that it looks more like A8 or A7 given his open limp, but I have a hard time believing UTG checks on the flop AND THE TURN with Ax on this board. The only way that could happen is if he is slowplaying AJ and really hoping someone else will open up the action.

I think you are definitely beat by UTG here but honestly I can't fault a guy for just shipping it in, and reloading if beat.

Btw, I think your biggest mistake in the hand is not raising on the button vs a limper and a min-raiser.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-27-2007, 11:21 AM
Logun Logun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 559
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

Personally I have to make this call.

The action PF and Flop do not indicate JJ/AJ

therefore I am removing them from the villains' range.

with that in mind we are only beaten by A7 (A8 would be sick)

I honestly can only see them on 77/9T/A7
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-27-2007, 11:21 AM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

May as well give the results because there's not much more to analyze.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-27-2007, 11:29 AM
Rainclouds Rainclouds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: weeee graduated
Posts: 1,448
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

Nah I'm not folding here.

Say you fold. UTG turned out to be bluffing with 2 clubs and CO called with A5o. You're gonna hate yourself forever.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-27-2007, 11:36 AM
Phytopath Phytopath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 782
Default Re: NL 100 | Echelon Theorem?

The CO is an uber donkey, so his call doesn't change much IMO, so this is a call by me, I fold if the players are better/tighter maybe but not here. I think with something like A7, A8 the pot would've been raised more before the river
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.