#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
largely libertarian
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
[ QUOTE ]
I used to post and read the content here pretty frequently. No interest whatsoever in pie-in-the-sky AC nonsense and I've noticed that when I do browse here it is harder, than say two years ago, to find anything worth reading after gleaning out the AC rubbish. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. A handful of aggressive spammers have now taken over this forum and driven out virtually all meaningful political discourse. This is an intentional strategy, and will not end as long as the management of TwoPlusTwo continues to tolerate it. q/q |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I used to post and read the content here pretty frequently. No interest whatsoever in pie-in-the-sky AC nonsense and I've noticed that when I do browse here it is harder, than say two years ago, to find anything worth reading after gleaning out the AC rubbish. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. A handful of aggressive spammers have now taken over this forum and driven out virtually all meaningful political discourse. This is an intentional strategy, and will not end as long as the management of TwoPlusTwo continues to tolerate it. q/q [/ QUOTE ] So what you peddle here is meaningful political discourse I take it? Allow me to expand on my one-liner: A lot of people here think that "should we continue having a 30%+ federal income tax" is a much more meaningful discussion than "Should we spend the income tax (forgone conclusion) on subsidizing poor people or on blowing up the middle east?" Meanwhile if you just want to talk current events and partisan jostling, I don't see anyone "spamming" threads like "Gore/Obama". |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I used to post and read the content here pretty frequently. No interest whatsoever in pie-in-the-sky AC nonsense and I've noticed that when I do browse here it is harder, than say two years ago, to find anything worth reading after gleaning out the AC rubbish. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. A handful of aggressive spammers have now taken over this forum and driven out virtually all meaningful political discourse. This is an intentional strategy, and will not end as long as the management of TwoPlusTwo continues to tolerate it. q/q [/ QUOTE ] I'm not ACist but I think the AC threads are interesting because they make very good arguments. You know what an argument is right? It's the thing that's not the mindless mud-slinging that you do. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
[ QUOTE ]
Agreed. A handful of aggressive spammers have now taken over this forum and driven out virtually all meaningful political discourse. This is an intentional strategy, and will not end as long as the management of TwoPlusTwo continues to tolerate it. q/q [/ QUOTE ] |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
[ QUOTE ]
This just in... Ron Paul's poll number are STILL dead. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, amazing what kind of numbers pollsters can manufacture through manipulation of the truth. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
[ QUOTE ]
Agreed. A handful of intelligent posters have now taken over this forum and driven out virtually all "ZOMG we Republicans and Democrats are soooooo different in how we want to oppress people" discussions. This is an intentional strategy, and will not end as long as the average 2+2er remains more intelligent than the average person. q/q [/ QUOTE ] |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
[ QUOTE ]
I used to post and read the content here pretty frequently. No interest whatsoever in pie-in-the-sky AC nonsense and I've noticed that when I do browse here it is harder, than say two years ago, to find anything worth reading after gleaning out the AC rubbish. [/ QUOTE ] That's really a beautiful compliment. The harder people scream that it's pie in the sky nonsense, without engaging in calm, thoughtful and pleasant discussion, we know who is more comfortable with their ideas, worldview and experiences. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how many non-ACists read this forum?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I used to post and read the content here pretty frequently. No interest whatsoever in pie-in-the-sky AC nonsense and I've noticed that when I do browse here it is harder, than say two years ago, to find anything worth reading after gleaning out the AC rubbish. [/ QUOTE ] That's really a beautiful compliment. The harder people scream that it's pie in the sky nonsense, without engaging in calm, thoughtful and pleasant discussion, we know who is more comfortable with their ideas, worldview and experiences. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, especially as I have never never ever seen an ACist casually dismiss an opposing idea as rubbish. Just for the record I am neither Statist or ACist. I am a Bolloxist. I believe it is all Bollox. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. |
|
|