#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nano limit players
I've had 44k at 10NL on Stars with 4.4 PTBB/100 winrate. I've attempted 25NL for 1.5k hands here and there, and ran really bad at -20 PTBB/100. My roll is $300 right now. Is this roll big enough to take a shot at 25NL on stars? Or should I keep grinding at 10NL a bit more?
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nano limit players
Playing too many hands.
Calling raises you shouldnt call at higher stakes. Playing too passive milking pots against donks. Etc. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nano limit players
[ QUOTE ]
I've had 44k at 10NL on Stars with 4.4 PTBB/100 winrate. I've attempted 25NL for 1.5k hands here and there, and ran really bad at -20 PTBB/100. My roll is $300 right now. Is this roll big enough to take a shot at 25NL on stars? Or should I keep grinding at 10NL a bit more? [/ QUOTE ] If you play one table you should be fine, unless you drop back to 200. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nano limit players
12.5ptbb/100 12 tabling over 32k hands of $5nl.
I'm going to play a little more $5nl as i'm doing a bankroll challenge and after taking a 2 buy-in shot at $25nl and losing (ran bad)i dropped down to $5nl instead of $10. I actually find it quite relaxing playing these limits but the downside is $5nl has the worst traffic from 1c/2c to $1/$2. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nano limit players
Over a 25k hand sample, i ran 27ish PTBB/100 hands @ 2$ NL. Then after some decent tournament finishes, i ran very little 5$ and 10$ NL, and moved up to 25$ NL. However after some recent unfortunate events @ Full Tilt and Poker stars, might be moving down to 10$ NL.
|
|
|