the old 5bb/100

[ikestoys]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
just me and cts i think

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm at 6.43ptBB/100 from 5/10 to 15/30, 60k hands

Throw in 2/4 and I'm at 7.12ptBB/100 over 65k hands

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry man, that sample size is really not that big. i ran at 7.2/100 for my first 98k hands of 2/4. i'm still happy with where it is after 223k hands, but it's a big chunk lower now. come back when you have at least a few hundred thousand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I only put the hands I have above 2/4. For the year, 6.0ptBB/100 over 110k. A fair margin of this is at SSNL though it brought my ptBB/100 down. Everything else is on my old computer.

[skier_5]

sooo dependent on # of tables and game selection as well as skill.

There was a screenshot of the 5/10 players on Ft in a the [censored] thread a while back, few decent samples with one guy at 5.8 over 150k hands I think. Most people aren't doing it though.

[aejones]

just me and cts and ikestoys

[aejones]

schwaza, i'll be happy to report to you after a few hundred thousand hands

see you in 2008 !

[cts]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
just me and cts i think

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm at 6.43ptBB/100 from 5/10 to 15/30, 60k hands

Throw in 2/4 and I'm at 7.12ptBB/100 over 65k hands

[/ QUOTE ]

joke of a sample size for determining winrate with much accuracy

[schwza]

[ QUOTE ]
schwaza, i'll be happy to report to you after a few hundred thousand hands

see you in 2008 !

[/ QUOTE ]

if you're that confident then talk to TWP. i'd love to see this bet get made with anybody involved.

[Ansky]

I've had close to 100k breakeven stretches, as well as 1 ridiculous hot streak well over 5ptbb, so I'm semi convinced that poker is all luck anyways!

[cts]

yea ive had 100k at 13ptbb/100 i think and 100k at < 0ptbb

[aejones]

jesus, you guys play a lot of hands

[DMoogle]

[ QUOTE ]
yea ive had 100k at 13ptbb/100 i think and 100k at < 0ptbb

[/ QUOTE ]
That is really really really sick.