Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-16-2007, 11:40 PM
PBJaxx PBJaxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ship Ship
Posts: 2,601
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

The size of the river bet doesn't really matter here. In the example, we figured out his calling range for a $75 bet. Of course, in reality, different bet sizes would result in different calling ranges.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-16-2007, 11:56 PM
wildzer0 wildzer0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Balmer, hon
Posts: 2,211
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

I hope this is appropriate in this thread, but I think this is a pretty basic range question. Here's an area I have a lot of trouble with when thinking in terms of ranges. Well, i have a lot of trouble with it in general, but this is one specific area [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

UTG is 28/14/2.5. He's not very good. My notes say that he limp/minraises w/ big pocket pairs, will raise smaller pairs. With a PFR of 14%, and given those reads, I would tend to put him on a range after raising utg of around 22-JJ, AT+, KQ. So, he ended up having an Ax hand here, which I wouldn't have included in my postflop range calcs.

Basically my question is, how do I incorporate these random hand possibilities in my hand ranges? I see people include things like "10% random cards" in the hand range estimations, how do you arrive at that number, and how do you actually use that number when using your range in decision making?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (4 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

BB ($23.25)
UTG ($58.50)
Hero ($98)
SB ($43.45)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $4</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls $3.

Flop: ($8.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets $3</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $6</font>, BB calls $3.

Turn: ($20.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $15</font>, BB calls $13.25 (All-In).

River: ($48.75) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: $48.75

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
BB has Kc 7h (straight, ace high).
UTG has Ad 4c (one pair, aces).
Outcome: BB wins $47. UTG wins $1.75. </font>
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-17-2007, 12:17 AM
Fat Nicky Fat Nicky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: StartWeight-260, Current-238
Posts: 5,017
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

wildzer0, the villain in this hand is raising UTG is a 4-handed hand, so he is effectively in the CO, so he would probably have a wider range here than you originally suspected.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-17-2007, 12:28 AM
wildzer0 wildzer0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Balmer, hon
Posts: 2,211
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

Ah, just pulled a quick example and didn't read it thoroughly enough [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] But I'm still curious as to how you weight in "random" hands, or is it just something you essentially ignore until you have a read otherwise?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-17-2007, 10:26 AM
onoble onoble is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: In why see
Posts: 785
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

Not meant to hijack but if I may... just for fun, alter the hand a bit and put us in a slightly tougher position:


1/2NL (6max) - $200 eff stacks
Villain is 35/8/0.9 - Loose-passive calling station


Pre-flop:
Villain open-limps from MP. It folds to hero on the button with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] who raises to $10, folds to villain who calls $8.

Flop ($23): 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Villain checks, hero bets $17, villain calls



Turn ($57): 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

<font color="red">
Villain bets $35...</font>

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a spot I find myself in too frequently.

How is the range effected?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-17-2007, 10:50 AM
Paul Thomson Paul Thomson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: donking it up NL200
Posts: 3,589
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

[ QUOTE ]
I hope this is appropriate in this thread, but I think this is a pretty basic range question. Here's an area I have a lot of trouble with when thinking in terms of ranges. Well, i have a lot of trouble with it in general, but this is one specific area [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

UTG is 28/14/2.5. He's not very good. My notes say that he limp/minraises w/ big pocket pairs, will raise smaller pairs. With a PFR of 14%, and given those reads, I would tend to put him on a range after raising utg of around 22-JJ, AT+, KQ. So, he ended up having an Ax hand here, which I wouldn't have included in my postflop range calcs.

Basically my question is, how do I incorporate these random hand possibilities in my hand ranges? I see people include things like "10% random cards" in the hand range estimations, how do you arrive at that number, and how do you actually use that number when using your range in decision making?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (4 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

BB ($23.25)
UTG ($58.50)
Hero ($98)
SB ($43.45)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $4</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls $3.

Flop: ($8.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets $3</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $6</font>, BB calls $3.

Turn: ($20.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $15</font>, BB calls $13.25 (All-In).

River: ($48.75) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: $48.75

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
BB has Kc 7h (straight, ace high).
UTG has Ad 4c (one pair, aces).
Outcome: BB wins $47. UTG wins $1.75. </font>

[/ QUOTE ]

The way you incorporate random hands is by WEIGHTING them. So in other words, insead of including all of the AXs hands, you include half of them. Similarly if the villains sometimes limps with lower pocket pairs and sometimes raises, than just include half or whatever % of those hands you want.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-17-2007, 10:59 AM
Mike MacIntosh Mike MacIntosh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spinnin FTW!
Posts: 2,161
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

nh
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-17-2007, 11:19 AM
CobraGoat CobraGoat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Jack Burton of uNL
Posts: 999
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

Bravo! TY.

FWIW, im working on trying to broaden my range assignment to PF. currently I find myself getting to the turn and then working the hand backwards to really isolate the range. However, while this works well against many opps, there are many situations where my analysis is simply applied too late.

I cannot agree more with your suggestion to assign these ranges while we are at the table during all aspects of the hand (and it goes without saying, to do this when we are not in the hand!).

One caveat... when we encounter a thinking opponent who is at least a second level thinker do we need to move from thinking of his range with respect to our hand to his range with respect to the range he puts us on (as opposed to the specific hand he puts us on)?

Goot post.

Would someone be a gem and post this in the uNL forum?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-17-2007, 11:20 AM
sebbb sebbb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 970
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

good post.

How did you personally arrive at the point where you could put consciously your opponent on a range on every hand? Is it just practice, maybe playing fewer tables some of the time and watching every hand as well?

Is the next step being able to do it subconsciously?


Also concerning your example:

Here is what would be my thought process:

Preflop: do you really list all those hands in your head? I'd be more likely to think: "ok, he called my raise so he probably doesn't have a crappy hand"

Flop: my thought: " ok so he calls, maybe he is slowplaying a great hand such as a 6 or two 7's, maybe he has two pairs (but most likely I'm ahead), maybe he has a flush draw (with possible overcards) or a straight draw"

I don't really think I have time to list hands, but I think more about the type of hand he might have. Is that what I should do?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-17-2007, 11:36 AM
PBJaxx PBJaxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ship Ship
Posts: 2,601
Default Re: Possible Pooh-bah? - The Basics of Thinking in Terms of Ranges

[ QUOTE ]
One caveat... when we encounter a thinking opponent who is at least a second level thinker do we need to move from thinking of his range with respect to our hand to his range with respect to the range he puts us on (as opposed to the specific hand he puts us on)?

[/ QUOTE ]

There are several things to this. Really the first step when facing a second level thinker is to adjust the information you use in order to acquire his range. This is the basics of third-level thinking. We use what we think he thinks our range is (our perceived range) in order to help identify his range. The simple way of saying this is: "Since my image to villain is xxx, then he probably puts me on range xxx-xxx."

Now to take this another step further, which involves adjusting your range so that it fairs well against his range while remaining deceptive, see this article by Jman. This is a great article.

http://www.bluffmagazine.com/onlinefeature/gbucks.asp
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.