Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:12 PM
SomthingOrOther SomthingOrOther is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 221
Default Re: New to 2+2

I get it a bunch of spades are dead

that was helpfull, ty
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:13 PM
Watkins Watkins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Back at work
Posts: 432
Default Re: New to 2+2

[ QUOTE ]
I get it a bunch of spades are dead

[/ QUOTE ]

You almost do - that may not be all thats dead
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:14 PM
SomthingOrOther SomthingOrOther is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 221
Default Re: New to 2+2

2k's 2'qs 39's 3'A'a

so 10 outs still though thats 35% 4-way
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:14 PM
fretelöo fretelöo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,495
Default Re: New to 2+2

[ QUOTE ]
I get it a bunch of spades are dead

that was helpfull, ty

[/ QUOTE ]

Not only spades. How often do you expect to win (after this action) if a K falls? Or a Q?

Also: Punctuation FTW!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:35 PM
SomthingOrOther SomthingOrOther is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 221
Default Re: New to 2+2

Because of K-10 KJ AK?

I think I'm getting it!

89 and Q9 even

WOW i SUCK.

but at least I see why now.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:36 PM
Zeldark Zeldark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Better than yesterday!!!
Posts: 1,904
Default Re: New to 2+2

Results should only affect your reads for future hands.
They should not affect your decision/regret for the hand in question at all.

See the difference?

Edit: I should also add that since results do effect how we think we should play it, even though it shouldn't, that's why we are avid about not seeing the results for the current hand in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:38 PM
SomthingOrOther SomthingOrOther is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 221
Default Re: New to 2+2

I see the difference but i wasnt regretting. I just wanted to know what i did wrong. Fret pretty much told me

I miscounted my outs and overplayed the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:53 PM
Dr. Matt Dr. Matt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buying a house
Posts: 686
Default Re: New to 2+2

The bare minimum winrate I've seen is by this guy. I usually run around 20BB/100, so if you're not doing that, I'd say you're either 1) being too tight, or 2) being too loose. Watch out for second-barrelling the turn on ui overs into TAGs. You don't want to be doing that... especially on dry boards.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:58 PM
Second Toughest Second Toughest is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 142
Default Re: New to 2+2

Welcome to the forum!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-21-2007, 09:55 PM
bung bung is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: I\'m not a donkey, I\'m a horse.......
Posts: 726
Default Re: New to 2+2

[ QUOTE ]
The bare minimum winrate I've seen is by this guy. I usually run around 20BB/100, so if you're not doing that, I'd say you're either 1) being too tight, or 2) being too loose. Watch out for second-barrelling the turn on ui overs into TAGs. You don't want to be doing that... especially on dry boards.

[/ QUOTE ]

20BB/100 hands is not sustainable bro. And btw, 6.11bb/100 hands is SICK. Best I've ever seen, and I'm sure I speak for most if not all 2p2ers.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.