Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-27-2007, 05:41 PM
Assani Fisher Assani Fisher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BRINGING THE HOLIDAY CHEER
Posts: 11,592
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Plus, as much as I sometimes dislike the 10-point must system it is a cut above the open-ended Japanese system.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't stand the 10 point must system for MMA. The judges are too conservative in awarding 10-8 rounds.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm very unfamiliar with the 10 point must system...

explain to me exactly why they don't just score a round 1-0(narrow win of the round), 2-0(domination of the round), or 3-0(complete dominance of the round, fight probably ending soon anyway)?

That way instead of silly scores like 107-106 it would just be something like 13-8.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-27-2007, 05:45 PM
TalkingDonkey TalkingDonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: hurdling your DBs
Posts: 864
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Plus, as much as I sometimes dislike the 10-point must system it is a cut above the open-ended Japanese system.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't stand the 10 point must system for MMA. The judges are too conservative in awarding 10-8 rounds.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm very unfamiliar with the 10 point must system...

explain to me exactly why they don't just score a round 1-0(narrow win of the round), 2-0(domination of the round), or 3-0(complete dominance of the round, fight probably ending soon anyway)?

That way instead of silly scores like 107-106 it would just be something like 13-8.

[/ QUOTE ]

They don't do it because scoring is done by athletic comission judges who use 10-point must.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-27-2007, 06:06 PM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,079
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

[ QUOTE ]
I think this is going to turn out really nicely. There are going to be some upset Pride fans though, because they are changing to UFC rules (no soccer kicks or knees to the head, elbows ok), but they are still keeping the ring.

LINK

[/ QUOTE ]

They might as well wear skirts into the ring. It's ridic. to ban soccer kicks and knees to the head and stomps for a variety of reasons. [censored] NSAC retards.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-27-2007, 06:26 PM
HajiShirazu HajiShirazu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Writing the shortstack manifesto
Posts: 3,258
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

10 point must system is awful for MMA, or for that matter, boxing fights with a low number of rounds. It really takes the excitement out of fights when you know that the guy who barely lost the first couple of rounds probably isn't going to be able to score a third round KO. And it's worse in MMA because it's much easier to turtle with a big lead, as long as you defend reasonably well.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-27-2007, 07:01 PM
4thstreetpete 4thstreetpete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 1000+ Posts
Posts: 2,468
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

Is this the first step for pride to get a TV deal in Japan once again? Dana fears Yakuza.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-27-2007, 07:04 PM
DonkeyKongSr DonkeyKongSr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Home of Best Hockey Team Ever
Posts: 3,487
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think this is going to turn out really nicely. There are going to be some upset Pride fans though, because they are changing to UFC rules (no soccer kicks or knees to the head, elbows ok), but they are still keeping the ring.

LINK

[/ QUOTE ]

They might as well wear skirts into the ring. It's ridic. to ban soccer kicks and knees to the head and stomps for a variety of reasons. [censored] NSAC retards.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's just as ridiculous as banning elbows.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-27-2007, 07:40 PM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,079
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think this is going to turn out really nicely. There are going to be some upset Pride fans though, because they are changing to UFC rules (no soccer kicks or knees to the head, elbows ok), but they are still keeping the ring.

LINK

[/ QUOTE ]

They might as well wear skirts into the ring. It's ridic. to ban soccer kicks and knees to the head and stomps for a variety of reasons. [censored] NSAC retards.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's just as ridiculous as banning elbows.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, it's much worse. Elbows are simply another weapon in the lay-and-pray arsenal and they tend to stop fights prematurely due to cuts. I'm pretty indifferent to them being banned or allowed.

OTOH, removing Stomps/Soccer Kicks/Knees to downed opponents removes the entire dimension of Standing vs. Prone combat from MMA and unnecessarily shifts the balance of power to wrestlers.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-27-2007, 07:48 PM
Boris Boris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 7,943
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

Peete - Pride lost their TV deal in Japan? That must explain the ridiculously low purchase price.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-27-2007, 09:25 PM
jstnrgrs jstnrgrs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,840
Default Re: UFC buys Pride

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Plus, as much as I sometimes dislike the 10-point must system it is a cut above the open-ended Japanese system.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't stand the 10 point must system for MMA. The judges are too conservative in awarding 10-8 rounds.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, the problem with both systems is that there aren't any black-and-white guidelines for scoring. But I feel the 10-point must is a more structured and legitimate form of scoring; more emphasis should be put on trying to finish the fight in the 10-point system though - this is the one aspect of Japanese-style scoring I like.

[/ QUOTE ]

Has anyone eversuggested a system in which, if the fight weren't finished within the time limit, it would be declared a draw regardless of who "appeared" to be the better fighter? I think this would make for more interesting fights.

Also, why 5 minute rounds? Why not just set a time limit and let the fight go until that limit is up? Is it a safty concern? (I don't see why it would be.)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-27-2007, 09:35 PM
TalkingDonkey TalkingDonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: hurdling your DBs
Posts: 864
Default Re: UFC buys Pride



Has anyone eversuggested a system in which, if the fight weren't finished within the time limit, it would be declared a draw regardless of who "appeared" to be the better fighter? I think this would make for more interesting fights.

Also, why 5 minute rounds? Why not just set a time limit and let the fight go until that limit is up? Is it a safty concern? (I don't see why it would be.)

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure not. If, for 3 rounds, fighter A scores knockdowns on the feet, passes guard, lands Gnp from mount, goes for submissions, but cannot finish fighter B who shows no offense and is pounded on...then the two are equal?

5 minute rounds are mandated by comission rules. Early, pre-sanctioned UFC's had no time limit, then eventually went to 15 minute limits.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.