ABA 400k pot - Page 3

catcher193 · #21 03-23-2007, 05:46 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
pokenum -o qd qc 3h ad - ts qh jc js - 4c as 2c 2s -- 9s 6c qs
Omaha Hi: 666 enumerated boards containing Qs 9s 6c
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Qc Ad Qd 3h 359 53.90 307 46.10 0 0.00 0.539
Js Ts Jc Qh 184 27.63 482 72.37 0 0.00 0.276
As 2s 4c 2c 123 18.47 543 81.53 0 0.00 0.185

[/ QUOTE ]

HUGE EQUITY SALAZARRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
Anybody quoting this without leveling is an IDIOT.

Run the correct equity calculations for the side pot equity aside from main pot.

people are so stupid its amazing.

chiznadAZ · #22 03-23-2007, 05:46 PM

[ QUOTE ]
DB was bustin aba up before this so I don't think it's that big of a deal...I believe most of it was aba's money to begin with.

[/ QUOTE ]
mute point, either way a 400k pot hurts even if it was mostly ABA's cash to start..

catcher193 · #23 03-23-2007, 05:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
DB was bustin aba up before this so I don't think it's that big of a deal...I believe most of it was aba's money to begin with.

[/ QUOTE ]
mute point, either way a 400k pot hurts even if it was mostly ABA's cash to start..

[/ QUOTE ]
LOL

closer · #24 03-23-2007, 05:49 PM

Side pot with no dead cards

pokenum -o qc ad qd 3h - js ts jc qh -- qs 9s 6c
Omaha Hi: 820 enumerated boards containing Qs 9s 6c
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Qc Ad Qd 3h 444 54.15 376 45.85 0 0.00 0.541
Js Ts Jc Qh 376 45.85 444 54.15 0 0.00 0.459

Side pot with dead cards

pokenum -o qc ad qd 3h - js ts jc qh -- qs 9s 6c / as 2s 4c 2c
Omaha Hi: 666 enumerated boards containing Qs 9s 6c
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Qc Ad Qd 3h 375 56.31 291 43.69 0 0.00 0.563
Js Ts Jc Qh 291 43.69 375 56.31 0 0.00 0.437

Side pot if Aba has 99 instead of QQ

Omaha Hi: 666 enumerated boards containing Qs 9s 6c
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
9c Ad 9d 3h 321 48.20 345 51.80 0 0.00 0.482
Js Ts Jc Qh 345 51.80 321 48.20 0 0.00 0.518

Orlando Salazar · #25 03-23-2007, 05:51 PM

it's "moot" point just fyi.
Like i said from DB's perspective (since he can't see Aba's hole cards you results oriented sillies)
he is at worst 2:1 but probably much higher.

baronzeus · #26 03-23-2007, 05:51 PM

yeah,

i really think benyamine played this fine. if he can get aba to fold bottom set its great, if aba has top set (1 combo) then so be it, not that bad

closer · #27 03-23-2007, 05:51 PM

Side pot if aba held 9987 for second set and an OESD

pokenum -o 9c 8d 9d 7h - js ts jc qh -- qs 9s 6c / as 2s 4c 2c
Omaha Hi: 666 enumerated boards containing Qs 9s 6c
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
9c 9d 8d 7h 348 52.25 318 47.75 0 0.00 0.523
Js Ts Jc Qh 318 47.75 348 52.25 0 0.00 0.477

Orlando Salazar · #28 03-23-2007, 05:54 PM

Why did everyone hate on me before doing this simple input. I didn't even need to see the math to know that he's got great equity against what he puts Aba on. Ty closer.

catcher193 · #29 03-23-2007, 05:54 PM

nice river how lucky!

Yuv · #30 03-23-2007, 05:56 PM

David only had like 8k in the pot and it's very unlikely that aba folds there after putting over 1/2 his stack. So i'm not sure he played it great, but his equity is def higher than implied at first.