cricket world cup 2007

[hedgie43]

Vincent out for NZ but they should still win. 1 unit on NZ (-120).

[cboevey]

[ QUOTE ]
That was almost a monumental collapse by South Africa there. If only Sri Lanka had not finished its innings almost as poorly.

[/ QUOTE ]

Only ever seen 4 wickets in consecutive balls once before and that was in a school match.

[cboevey]

[ QUOTE ]
Vincent out for NZ but they should still win. 1 unit on NZ (-120).

[/ QUOTE ]

That was an awesome line - must have been just after he went out. New Zealand have been known to go out for some relatively low totals, but not against a team without any world class bowlers.

[hedgie43]

Skybet actually had NZ at +100 on Monday but I can't play there because I'm American. Talk about juicy...

[MyPetTurtle]

Cool thread. Funny about your tip on Aus at 1.26 to defend 322 against the Windies, cboevy. I put $2,500 on Aus at those odds the moment I saw the line. Easy money [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Does anyone else really like Sri Lanka at 1.59 against the West Indies tonight?

[cboevey]

Barring a batting collapse, Sri Lanka should walk this.

[MyPetTurtle]

I think I like these lines, what do you guys think?

South Africa to beat England @ 1.41 (ymu yum, imo).

Australia to beat England @ 1.29.

Sri Lanka to beat England @ 1.52.

South Africa to beat New Zealand @ 1.61.

[dennison]

I don't like the NZ bet but the rest are good.

[cboevey]

I'm with Dennison: agree with the first three, esp the second and third. Not to sure about NZ, I think they have the potential to beat South Africa quite comfortably.

[cboevey]

Currently West Indies need 357 to win against South Africa. Line is 1.08 now. See my post above (West Indies vs Australia) as to why I put the true odds at less than 1 percent. Oh add the fact that before this game the highest score at this ground was 304ish.