The Progressive Whiskey Thread - Page 3

adsman · #21 02-09-2007, 08:54 AM

Does Jack Daniels count?

Slow Play Ray · #22 02-09-2007, 09:07 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Does Jack Daniels count?

[/ QUOTE ]

is it not whiskey?

adsman · #23 02-09-2007, 09:08 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Does Jack Daniels count?

[/ QUOTE ]

is it not whiskey?

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently. I just thought that it was strange that it had been overlooked.

RichC. · #24 02-09-2007, 01:23 PM

Knob Creek, Makers Mark, Jack Daniels, cant go wrong with any of these.

For those who asked, JD is a whiskey, but not a bourbon. KC and MM are considered a bourbon, which is a form of whiskey. It is called bourbon because it is distilled in Bourbon County, KY.

turnipmonster · #25 02-09-2007, 01:54 PM

jack daniels is considerably better than stuff on or below the old granddad level.

Mike Gallo · #26 02-09-2007, 02:05 PM

Old Rip Van Winkle is an excellent bourbon whisky.

firstyearclay · #27 02-09-2007, 02:09 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Old Rip Van Winkle is an excellent bourbon whisky.

[/ QUOTE ]

DEVILS ROCK!!!!

MARTY FOR PRESIDENT.

Back to the thread:

Hurry up and climb the ladder, I just bought a bottle of Macallan. WOOHOO...black out city tonight!!

Mike Gallo · #28 02-09-2007, 02:12 PM

Macellan is Scotch whisky..different than bourbon whiskey...for whiskey to be considered/called bourbon it must be made in Kentucky.

El Diablo · #29 02-09-2007, 03:03 PM

Mike,

OK, first off, the thread is not about just bourbon. That's just what the low price point stuff is biased towards.

Secondly, your Old Rip Van Winkle post has absolutely nothing to do with this thread at this point. I should delete it, but I'll leave it to explain why.

Thirdly, I'm locking this thread because the concept while cool in theory seems to be too challenging to actually execute here. I'll start a "review a whiskey" thread that will obviously be more comfortable for people, haha.