|
|
#21
11-29-2006, 08:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] fold preflop [/ QUOTE ] this was my thought when i read the title of the post. it was also my thought after i read the hand. [/ QUOTE ] I call BS on this coming from you man. No chance you are folding for 1/2 a bet against a field of donks. 
|
|
#22
11-29-2006, 11:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] fold preflop [/ QUOTE ] this was my thought when i read the title of the post. it was also my thought after i read the hand. [/ QUOTE ] I call BS on this coming from you man. No chance you are folding for 1/2 a bet against a field of donks. [/ QUOTE ] I agree, no compentent 2+2er is ever folding 76o getting 11-1 here in a live game, assuming the BB is sane. If they say otherwise I simply wont believe them.
|
|
#23
11-29-2006, 11:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] fold preflop [/ QUOTE ] this was my thought when i read the title of the post. it was also my thought after i read the hand. [/ QUOTE ] I call BS on this coming from you man. No chance you are folding for 1/2 a bet against a field of donks. [/ QUOTE ] when have you ever seen me get out of line with a hand that wasn't suited? and also, the fact that i think folding is correct doesn't necessarily mean i'm folding. i don't play good.
|
|
#24
11-29-2006, 12:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] fold preflop [/ QUOTE ] this was my thought when i read the title of the post. it was also my thought after i read the hand. [/ QUOTE ] I call BS on this coming from you man. No chance you are folding for 1/2 a bet against a field of donks. [/ QUOTE ] I agree, no compentent 2+2er is ever folding 76o getting 11-1 here in a live game, assuming the BB is sane. If they say otherwise I simply wont believe them. [/ QUOTE ] I certainly play on the tighter end of the TAG spectrum preflop but I would play here. I am concerned though when JT says it is a muck because he is way "competent".
|
|
#25
11-29-2006, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67o in SB
i just looked around a bit and found this:
http://www.pokerstove.com/analysis/unsuited.php someone tell me if it's any good. it advocates folding.
|
|
#27
11-29-2006, 03:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.pokerstove.com/analysis/unsuited.php someone tell me if it's any good. it advocates folding. [/ QUOTE ] It's plenty good. It's a fold.
|
|
#28
11-29-2006, 03:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
what is the cutoff then? 87?98? [/ QUOTE ] thirddan, 87o, and 98o have a little more chance of winning with pairs and better straights. Mine is about 98o and sometimes it's T9o in a 1/2 structure. -JT
|
|
#29
11-29-2006, 03:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67o in SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] folding 76o getting 11-1 here [/ QUOTE ] ILOVEPOKER929, 11-1 on what? Please tell me, seriously. Thanks, Joe Tall [/ QUOTE ] Why do I get the feeling this is a trick question and im walking into a bear trap......anyways, the approx pot odds the hero is receiving preflop at his point of action is 11-1. I use the word "approx" to qualify this since the BB will raise a nonzero % of the time. I just feel that getting these pot odds, and factoring in implied odds assuming I play well postflop, I can turn a profit on this call. An analogous example can be found in HPFAP, page 45 where David Sklansky/Mason Malmuth talk about calling from the SB in this same kind of situation with a hand like 86o.
|
|
#30
11-29-2006, 04:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67o in SB
this is a pretty decent pf discussion. i regularly complete in this spot, but now i am reassessing. either way i think it's close. i also think it's table-dependent and not an absolute either way. i also think i intend on c/f alot of flops even if i do complete. that pokerstove link was interesting. okay, ive not added enough for now.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
